SOUMEN SEN, UDAY KUMAR
Jharna Mandal – Appellant
Versus
Prashant Kumar Mandal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
UDAY KUMAR, J.
1. The Judgment and decree of Ld. Additional District Judge 4th Court, Pashim Midnapur passed in Mat Suit No. 512 of 2008 on May 25th 2009 is the subject matter of this appeal, whereby the learned Trial Judge has decreed the suit instituted Under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 by petitioner-respondent Prashant Kumar Mandal for termination of his marital ties solemnized on 2nd July, 2001 with the appellant-respondent-wife Jharna Mandal. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied by the said order, appellant-Wife Jharna Mandal has preferred this appeal.
2. The emotional warmth in matrimonial relationship of Prashant Kumar Mandal and Jharna Mandal has gradually eroded due to constant commotions which arose in their life after few months of their marriage solemnized on 2nd July 2001. The unemployment of Prashant was the root cause of her agony and turbulence in their matrimonial life. Though, Prashant was earning from his profession of part-time teaching in school and from private tuition, yet the same was not sufficient to satisfy the financial requirement of his family. So, he occasionally asked money from appellant Jharna; as she was getting honorarium of Rs
Gurbux Singh vs. Harminder Singh
Kakoli Das vs. Dr. Asish Kumar Das
K. Srinivas Rao vs. D.A. Deepa 2013 (5) SCC 226
Parveen Mehta vs. Inderjit Mehta
Satis Sitole vs. Ganga, AIR 2008 SC 3093 and Maya Devi vs. Jagdish Prasad
Sirajmohmed Khan Janmohamad Khan vs. Haizunnisa Yasinkhan and Another
Shobha Rani vs. Madhukar Reddi
V. Bhagat vs. D. Bhagat (1994) 1 SCC 337
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.