IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL), J.
Mr. Debapratim Neogie – Appellant
Versus
The State of West Bengal & Anr. – Respondents
CRR 1376 of 2019
Decided on : 01-04-2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. establishment of business relationship. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. contents of sub-lease agreement. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. electricity supply issues and complaints. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. inducement and intention in complaint. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. legal implications of dishonesty and fraud. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 6. distinction between civil and criminal matters. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 7. rationale for quashing proceedings. (Para 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 8. conclusion and directive of the court. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43) |
JUDGMENT :
Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.
1. The present revision has been preferred praying for quashing of Charge Sheet filed in Durgapur Police Station Case No. 425 of 2018 under Sections 420 and 406 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 pending before the Court of the Learned 3rd Chief Judicial Magistrate at Durgapur, Paschim Bardhaman.
2. The allegations made by the Opposite Party No. 2 in the Written Complaint are as follows:-
ii) We were looking for a suitable accommodation for our office and commercial purpose. In course of our search, we came in contact with above named Mr. Debapratim Neogie, Mr. Debabrata Neogie and Mr. Subrata Neogie, all Directors of ‘Neogie Auto (P) Ltd’., and persons-in-charge, control and responsible for day to day affairs of their company ?Neogie Auto (P) Ltd., who represented that their company is having sufficient space to let out and offered us to take their premises for our office purpose.
iii) On expressing our requirements that we need round the clock supply of electricity, the above named persons assured to give us round the clock electric supply up to 60KV from their transformer already installed at the premises. We having expressed that we need additional power of 37KV of electricity Power over and above 60KV to run our office, the above named persons agreed and assured to increase the load as required by us.
iv) Believing in good faith in their representation and assurances, we agreed to enter into long term Sub-Lease agreement at their premises.
v) Accordingly a registered sub lease deed dated 21st April, 2015 was executed by and between the above named company and ourselves. In terms of sub-lease, the above named ‘Noegie Auto (P) Ltd.’, as Lessor granted lease in our favour in respect of 5000 sqt. little more or less area situated at Ground Floor and 1st floor comprised in Holding No. N/19, NH-2 South, Touzi No. 01 Mouza–Faridpur City Centre Durgapur – 16 J.L. No. 74 C.S. Plot No. 3395 (P) NH-2, Khatian No. 1362, L.O.P. No. 1 Ward No. 22 within Durgapur Municipal Corporation under the jurisdiction of the Office of the Additional District Sub-Registrar Durgapur District–Burdwan, Durgapur-713216 (W.B.) on the terms and conditions mentioned in the said Sub-Lease.
vi) Thereafter, agreement dated 09.04.2016 executed between said “Neogie Auto (P) Ltd.”, and ourselves, the above named persons agreed to provide us additional 37KV of electricity Power over and above 60KV to run our office.
vii) At the time of making such sub-lease Deed and subsequent agreement, the above named persons have promised and assured that there would be no impediment from any corner, what so ever it may be, for smooth running of our business. Amongst others, it was also assured that there would be uninterrupted supply of electricity.
viii) Believing upon their promises and assurances, we parted with an onet
Abdul Qadir v. Madhav Prabhakar
A. Ayyasamy Vs A. Paramasivam & Ors.
Anand Kumar Mohatta & Anr. v. State (NCT of Delhi), Department of Home & Anr.
Ajay Mitra v. State of M.P. [(2003) 3 SCC 11 : 2003 SCC (Cri) 703
Aneeta Hada -versus- Godfather Travels And Tours Private Limited
Bharat Rasiklal v. Gautam Rasiklal
G. Sagar Suri v. State of U.P.
Hridaya Ranjan Prasad Verma v. State of Bihar
Hindustan Unilever Limited v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Himanshu -versus- B. Shivamurthy & Another
Indian Oil Corpn. v. NEPC India Ltd.
Rajesh Bajaj vs State NCT of Delhi and Ors.
Radhakrishnan v. Maestro Engineers
R.K. Vijayasarathy v. Sudha Seetharam
State of M.P. V. Awadh Kishore Gupta and Ors. : (2004) 1 SCC 691
Sarabjit Kaur vs State of Punjab and Anr.
Sharad Kumar Sanghi v. Sangita Rane
S.W. Palanitkar and Ors. vs State of Bihar and Anr. (2002) 1 SCC 241
State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal, 1992 Supp (1) SCC 335: 1992 SCC (Cri) 426
Trisuns Chemical Industry vs Rajesh Agarwal and Ors.
Uma Shankar Gopalika v. State of Bihar
The distinction between civil disputes and criminal offences is vital; mere breach of contract does not constitute criminal cheating without evidence of fraudulent intent.
Civil Disputes cannot be given colour of criminal cases as a pressure tactics.
Allegations of financial misconduct must establish criminal intent; mere breach of contract does not constitute a criminal offence under IPC sections 406 and 420.
The court established that allegations of criminal breach of trust and cheating require proof of entrustment and dishonest misappropriation, and that civil disputes can escalate to criminal offenses ....
Criminal proceedings cannot be initiated for mere breach of contract; allegations must disclose a criminal offence to justify prosecution.
Main Legal Point
Breaches of commercial agreements do not constitute criminal offenses unless fraudulent intent is established at the outset, reinforcing that civil disputes should not be converted into criminal matt....
A breach of contract does not constitute cheating unless fraudulent intent is proven at the outset of the agreement, as established in relevant legal precedents.
Criminal liability cannot be imposed in contractual disputes; only clear criminal intent warrants legal action under penal provisions.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.