Back
SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)
Debapratim Neogie – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. establishment of business relationship. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. contents of sub-lease agreement. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. electricity supply issues and complaints. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. inducement and intention in complaint. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. legal implications of dishonesty and fraud. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 6. distinction between civil and criminal matters. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 7. rationale for quashing proceedings. (Para 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 8. conclusion and directive of the court. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43) |
JUDGMENT :
Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.
1. The present revision has been preferred praying for quashing of Charge Sheet filed in Durgapur Police Station Case No. 425 of 2018 under Sections 420 and 406 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 pending before the Court of the Learned 3rd Chief Judicial Magistrate at Durgapur, Paschim Bardhaman.
2. The allegations made by the Opposite Party No. 2 in the Written Complaint are as follows:-
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
