BIVAS PATTANAYAK
West Bengal Kerosene Agents’ Welfare Association – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition for kerosene oil allocation. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondents contest maintainability of the writ. (Para 3) |
| 3. arguments on need and rationale of kerosene allocation. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. discussions on locus standi and rights. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. discussion on policy obligations of the central government. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 6. court's decision on need for policy revision. (Para 15) |
| 7. direction for framing a policy on allocation of kerosene oil. (Para 16) |
| 8. disposal of the writ petition. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
JUDGMENT :
Bivas Pattanayak, J.
1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a direction upon respondent nos.1 to 4 to make allocation of kerosene oil to the State of West Bengal considering the per capita requirement on uniform basis at par with other States and not to make any further curtailment in the allocation of kerosene oil to the State of West Bengal.
2. The brief fact of the petitioners’ case in a nutshell is as follows:
D. Nagaraj and Others versus State of Karnataka and Others
Bharat Singh and Others versus State of Haryana and Others
Chinta Lingam and Others versus Government of India and Other
Dantuluri Ram Raju v. State of A.P. (1972) 1 SCC 421
Krishnan Kakkanth versus Government of Kerala and Others
Lala Ram (Dead) by Legal Representative and Others versus Union of India and Another
N. Nagendra Rao & Co. v. State of A.P. (1994) 6 SCC 205 : 1994 SCC(Cri) 1609
N. D. Jayal v. Union of India (2004) 9 SCC 362
Shivajirao Nilangekar Patil versus Dr Mahesh Madhav Gosavi and Others
Sri-La-Sri Subramana Desika Gnansambanda Pandarasannadhi versus State of Madras and Another
South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. versus State of M.P. and Others
Article 19(1)(g) grants the right to trade, but specific governmental allocations are not guaranteed, allowing the government discretion in policy decisions.
The Central Government has a statutory duty to fix the subsidized price of kerosene oil for consumers under the Public Distribution System, and the delegation of this authority to oil companies was f....
Point of Law : Scheduled Tribes - Reservation/ Guidelines - LPG Distributorship - Selection of - Unless this petition was a PIL, such contentions of petitioner without having a cause of action, would....
When the distribution network of the present petitioner and the respondent no. 3 Society, who has a number of fair price shop retailers under its aegis.
The court upheld the Oil Marketing Companies' authority to transfer customers among distributors, affirming that the policy serves constitutional objectives of equitable resource allocation and does ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.