A.C.GUPTA, V.D.TULZAPURKAR, S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, R.S.PATHAK, P.N.BHAGWATI, D.A.DESAI, E.S.VENKATARAMIAH
S. P. Gupta: V. M. Tarkunde: J. L. Kalra: Iqbal M. Chagla: Lily Thomas: A. Rajappa: Union Of India: D. N. Pandey: R. Prasad Sinha – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India: Union Of India: Union Of India: P. Shivshankar: Union Of India: Union Of India: P. Subramanian: Union Of India: K. B. N. Singh – Respondent
Certainly! Please provide the legal document content or specify the key points you'd like me to analyze, and I will generate the summary with references accordingly.
JUDGMENT
Bhagwati, J.
(1) THESE Writ Petition filed in different High Courts and transferred to this Court under Article 139-A of the Constitution raise issues of great constitutional importance affecting the independence of the judiciary and they have been argued at great length before us. The arguments have occupied as many as thirty-five days and they have ranged over a large number of issues comprising every imaginable aspect of the judicial institution. Voluminous written submissions have been filed before us which reflect the enormous industry and vast erudition of the learned counsel appearing for the parties and a large number of authorities, Indian as well as foreign, have been brought to our attention. We must acknowledge with gratitude our indebtedness to the learned counsel for the great assistance they have rendered to us in the delicate and difficult task of adjudicating upon highly sensitive issues arising in these Writ Petition. We find, and this is not unusual in cases of this kind, that a considerable amount of passion has been injected into the arguments on both sides and some times passion may appear to lend strength to an argument, but, sit
Jaisingh Jairam Tyagi v. Manchand Ratilat Agaiwal
Amar Chand Butail v. Union of India
Amar Chand Butail v. Union of India
distinguished : Amar Chand Butail v. Union of India
Amur Chand Butail v. Union of India
Amrit Lal Shodhan v. F.N. Rana
Shyamlal Mohanlal v. State of Gujarat
followed : State of W.B. v. Nripendra Nath Bagchi
State of W. B. v. Nripendra Nath Bagchi
relied on : Chandra Mohan v. State of U.P
relied on : Chandra Mohan v. State of U.P.
Chandra Mohan v. State of U.P.
distinguished : Commissoner of Police v. Gordhandas Bhanji
Nalinakhya Bylack v. Shyam Sunder Haldar
Dwarkadas Srinivas v. Sholapur Spinning and Weaving Co. Ltd
Ram Jawaya Kapur v. State of Punjab
Corporation of the City af Glaigow v. central Law Board
referred to : Kanai Lal Sur v. Paramnidhi Sadhukhan
Shewpujanrai Indrasanrai Ltd. v. Collector of Cuitoms
distinguished : Shewpujanrai Indrasanrai Ltd. v. Collector of Customs
R. Mahaboob Sheriff v. Mysore State Transport Authority
Y.Mahaboob Sheriff v. Mysore State Transport Autharity
M. Pentiah v. Muddala Veeramallappa
relied on : Collector of Customs v. Digvijaysinhji Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd.
overruled : State of Punjab v. Sodhi Sukhdev Singh
overruled : State of Punjab v. Sodhi Sukhdev Singh
State of Punjab v. Sodhi Sukhdev Singh
overruled : State of Punjab v. Sodhi Sudhdev Singh
relied on : State of Punjab v. Sodhi Sukhdev Singh
followed : State of Punjab v. Sodhi Sukhdev Singh
considered : State of Punjab v. Sodhi Sukhdev Singh
relied on : Amar Chand Butail v. Union of India
Rohtas Industries Ltd. v. S.D. Agarwal
followed : Chandramouleshwar Prasad v. Patna Court
Hansraj Gordhandas v. H.H. Dave
A. Sanjeevi Naidu v. State of Madras
Adi Pherozshah Gandhi v. H.M.Seervai
Adi Phershah Gandhi v. H.M. Seervai
relied on : U.N.R. Rao v. Indira Gandhi
distinguished : Union of India v. Jyoti Prakash Afitter
Senior Supdt. v. K.V. Gopinath
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Vedilal Lallubhai
distinguished : KriskanGopal v. P.C. Sethi
explained : Krishan Gopal v. Prakash Chandra
relied on : E. P. Royappa v. State of T. N.
distinguished : State of Gujarat v. Skri Ambica Mills Ltd
K.Ramadas Shenoy v. Chief Officers, Twon Municipal council
Samsher Singh v. State of Punjab
relied on : State of U.P. v. Raj Narain
relied on : State of U.P. v. Raj Narain
applied : State of U.P. v. Raj Narain
Anandji Haridas and Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. Engineering Mazdoor Sangh
Anandji Haridas and Co. v. Engineer Mazdoor Sangh
Bar council of Maharastra v. M.V. Dabholkar
Bar council of Maharashtra v. M.V.Dabholkar
Sole Trustee v. Commissioner of Income Tax
Jasbhai Motibhai Desai v. Roshan Kumar
Jasbhai Motibhai Desai v. Roshan Kumar
State of T. N. v. Pyare Lal Malhotra
followed : State of Rajasthan v. Union of India
State of Rajasthan v. Union of India
State of Rajasthan v. Union of India
followed : Union of India v. Sankalchand Himatlal Sheth
referred to : Union of India v. Sankalchand Himatlal Sheth
relied on : Union of India v. Sankalchand Himatlat Sheth
relied on : Union of India v. Sankalchand Himatlal Sheth
minority view : Union of India v. Sankalchand Himatlal Sheth
affirmed : Union of India v. Sankalchand Himatlal Sheth
followed : Union of India v. Sankalchand Himatlal Sheth
Union of India v. Sankalchand Himatlal Sheth
followed : Union of India v. Sankalchand Himatlal Sheth
Union of India v. Sankalchand Himatlal Sheth
explained and relied on : Union of India v. Sankalchand Himatlal Sheth
affirmed : Union of India v. Sankalchand Himatlal Sheth
followed : Union of India v. SankalchandHimatlal Sheth
relied on : Union of India v. Sankalchand Himatlal Sheth
followed : Union of India v. Sankalchand Himatlal Sheth
affirmed : Union of India v. Sankalchand Himatlal Sheth
followed : Union of India v. Sankalchand Himatlal Sheth
affirmed and followed : Union of India v. Sankalchand Himatlal Sheth
affirmed : Union of India v. Sankalchand Himatlal Sheth
explained : Union of India v. Sankalchand Himatial Sheth
M\s Polestar Electronic (Pvt.) Ltd. v. Additional Commissiner, Sales Tax
Mangalare Electric Supply Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax
Mangalore Electric Supply Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax
Re the Special Courts Bill 1978
In re The Special Courts Bill 1978
relied on : Re The Spinal Courts Bill 1978
Dadaji alias Dina v. Sukhdeobabu
Sunil Batra (II) v. Delhi Admn
Sunil Batra (II) v. Delhi Admn
Municipal council v. Vardichan
Municipal council v. Vardichan
Municipal council v. Vardichan
referred to : V.B. Raju v. State of Gujarat
Fertilizer Corpn.Kamgar Union v. Union of India
referred to : Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
relied on : Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
distinguished : Kesavananda Bharati v.State of Kerala
explained : Mumbai Kamgar Sabha v. Abdulbhai Faizullabhai
A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras
A. K. Gapalan v. State of Madras
explained and distinguished : Sardari Lal v. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.