IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA, CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI
Arijit Banerjee, Biswaroop Chowdhury
Hero Sarkar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through the Intelligence Officer Narcotics Control Bureau Kolkata Zonal Unit – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Arijit Banerjee, J.
1. On August 22, 2023, acting on source information, the Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) team raided the petitioner’s house and seized huge quantity of contraband items. The petitioner was arrested on August 26, 2023. He prays for bail.
2. Arguments on behalf of the petitioner:-
(A) The head of the raiding team namely Shri Pushkar, himself acted as a Gazetted Officer while conducting the search and seizure.This is in violation of Section 50(1) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short ‘NDPS Act’).It also violates the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in State of Rajasthan v. Parmanand& Anr., (2014) 5 SCC 345, paras 15, 19, 20.
The petitioner also relies on the decisions of a Coordinate Bench of this Court in Re. Md. Mohaimen Hossain @ Md. Mohaimenul Haque @ Mom etc. , reported in 2014 SCC OnLine Cal 20405 and in Re. Sahedul Mahaldar reported in 2014 SCC OnLine Cal 22788 (B) The seizure list does not contain the signature of the petitioner. This supports the plea of the petitioner that he was not present at the time of seizure. It appears from the seizure memo that the seizure took place on August 26,2023 at 06:05 hours
State of Rajasthan v. Parmanand& Anr.
Sanjeet Kumar Singh @ Munna Kumar Singh v. State of Chhattisgarh
D.K. Basu v. The State of West Bengal
Union of India and Anr v. Sanjeev V. Deshpande
Jarnail Singh v. State of Punjab
Kallu Khan v. State of Rajasthan
Narcotics Control Bureau v. Mohit Aggarwal
Union of India v. Shiv Shanker Kesari
Union of India Through Narcotics Control Bureau, Lucknow v. Md. Nawaz Khan
Narcotics Control Bureau v. Kishan Lal & Ors.
Ratan Kumar Vishwas v. State of U.P. & Anr.
Union of India v. Niyazuddin SK.& Anr
Union of India v. Rattan Mallik @ Habul
Dharampal Singh v. State of Punjab
Mukesh Singh v. State (Narcotic Branch of Delhi)
Rizwan Khan v. State of Chhattisgarh
Hira Singh and Anr. V. Union of India & Anr.
Pooran Mal v. Director of Inspection (Investigation) New Delhi & Ors .
State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.