IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA, UDAY KUMAR
Gouri Das Biswas – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA, J.
1. The present appeal has been preferred against the dismissal of a writ petition filed by the appellant challenging an order passed by the Principal Secretary, Food and Supplies Department, Government of West Bengal whereby the latter disposed of the representation of the appellant by holding that the appellant is ineligible for grant of license in respect of a FPS shop-cum-godown.
2. The brief facts of the case are that a Vacancy Notification (VN) was issued by the respondent-authorities on September 1, 2023, inviting applications for grant of license against the vacancy of Fair Price Shop (Ration Shop) hereinafter refer to as “FPS.” Both the appellant and private respondent participated. The appellant's application was rejected as ineligible whereas the private respondent's application was allowed.
3. Challenging the same, the appellant gave a representation to the Principal Secretary, against the non-consideration of which the appellant moved a writ petition bearing W.P.A No.22897 of 2024. The said writ petition was disposed of by a learned Single Judge of this Court vide judgment dated October 8, 2024, directing the Principal Secretary to co
Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corpn. and Ors. v. Anoj Kumar Agarwala and Ors.
Mohd. Quaramuddin v. State of A.P.
Narinder Mohan Arya v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and Ors.
N.G. Projects Ltd. v. Vinod Kumar Jain and Ors.
State Bank of India v. Ram Chandra Dubeyand Ors.
Prakash Chand Meena and Ors. v. State of Rajasthan and Ors.
Tej Prakash Pathak and Ors. v. High Court of Rajasthan and Ors.
H.C. Sarin v. Union of India and Ors.
St. John’s College and Anr. v. Dr. S. Wilson and Ors.
Eligibility criteria outlined in the Vacancy Notification govern the selection process, with non-compliance resulting in rejection of applications. Principles of natural justice do not override estab....
A candidate must meet all eligibility criteria to have standing in challenging an administrative decision; mere dissatisfaction does not confer legal rights.
Parties must demonstrate clear aggrievement to maintain a writ petition against a selection decision, merely participating in the process does not confer actionable standing.
The failure to conduct a fair and transparent selection process for Fair Price Shop Dealers, deviating from established guidelines, constitutes sufficient grounds for annulment of said selections.
A writ petition challenging the appointment of a fair price shop dealer on compassionate grounds is not maintainable if the petitioner does not have a judicially enforceable right and the authorities....
Judicial review is justified when administrative decisions lack transparency and fairness in adherence to established procedural guidelines.
The court upheld that a review can be granted to an aggrieved individual, including non-parties, if vital amendments affecting the case were not earlier considered.
An applicant must demonstrate being aggrieved by the selection process to maintain a writ petition challenging licencing decisions.
Selection for public employment must be based on clear, objective criteria, with courts intervening where arbitrary processes are evident.
Employment and Service matter - Grade-IV employees - Selection process - Selection process is not subject matter of challenge in absence of any grounds, subsequent action of issuing appointment order....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.