IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
T.MADHAVI DEVI, J.
Adepu Shiva Prasad – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana and Others – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 4065 of 2025, Writ Petition Nos. 24978, 25400, 27396, 27794, 27902 of 2024
Decided On : 09-12-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petitions filed regarding selection process. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments challenging the selection process. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. defense of selection process by state counsel. (Para 8) |
| 4. court's analysis on adherence to guidelines. (Para 10 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. assessment of compliance with legal standards. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 6. final order to re-conduct examination. (Para 19 , 31) |
ORDER :
1. In W.P.No.4065 of 2025, the petitioner is seeking a Writ of Mandamus calling for records from the 4th respondent with regard to the selection process and appointment of respondents 5 to 56 as Fair Price Shop Dealers of Sircilla Mandal vide selection list dt.23.09.2024 at 9.45 PM issued by the 4th respondent pursuant to the Notification No.F/737/2024 and to declare the same as illegal, arbitrary, malafide on account of lack of transparency, as biased and ultra vires of G.O.Ms.No.20, Consumer Affairs, Food and Civil Supplies (CS.I-CCS) Department, dt.06.09.2018 and also the provisions of the Telangana Sate Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016 and as unconstitutional and consequently to set aside the same and to further direct respondents 1 to 3 to conduct the entire process afresh strictly in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.20 dt.06.09.2018 pursuant to the Notification No.F/737/2024 dt.29.08.2024 and to pass such other order or orders.
2. Brief facts leading to the filing of W.P.No.4065 of 2025 are that the 4th respondent has issued Notification No.F/737/2024 on 29.08.2024 calling for eligible candidates to be appointed as Fair Price Shop Dealers. The eligibility criteria and the procedure for selection/examination were provided in the Notification itself. The petitioner claims to have applied for Serial No.24 Fair Price Shop of Sircilla, Rajanna Sircilla District i.e., Fair Price Shop No.3908035. The examination was conducted for 80 marks with General Knowledge and Arithmetic questions and the candidates who secured 32 marks out of 80 marks were to be called for viva voce in the ratio of 1:5 for 20 marks. It is submitted that the result of the written examination was not declared and the petitioner came to know through some source that some people were called for interviews on 20.09.2024, 21.09.2024 and 23.09.2024 without declaring the results of the written test and the list of selected candidates was released on 23.09.2024 at about 9.45 PM. Therefore, according to the petitioner, the official respondents have not followed the prescribed procedure and have called the candidates of their choice for interview over Mobile/WhatsApp in a haphazard manner and even the ratio of calling for interview, i.e., 5 candidates for every dealership was not followed and that the people who were picked and chosen were on account of their political allegiance at the helm of affairs were called for interview and were selected and therefore, the selection process was not transparent and as per the procedure prescribed under G.O.Ms.No.20 dt.06.09.2018. Further, alleging that several malpractices have taken place in the selection process, W.P.No.4065 of 2025 has been filed.
3. W.P.No.27902 of 2024 has been filed challenging the selection and appointment of respondents 5 to 8 as Fair Price Shop Dealers of Sircilla, Pedduru, Mustipalli and Chinna Bonala with respect to four Fair Price Shops No.3908035, 3908049, 3908046 and 3908047 respectively as illegal and arbitrary and to set aside the same and also seeking a direction to the official respondents to conduct the entire process afresh strictly in accordance with the procedure prescribed in Telangana State Public Distribution System (Control) Order 2016 with regard to the selection and appointment of fair price shop dealers pursuant to the Notification No.F/737/2024 dt.29.08.2024 issued by the 4th respondent.
4. W.P.No.27794 of 2024 also has been filed challenging the selection and appointment of respondents 5 to 8 as Fair Price Shop Dealers of Sircilla, Pedduru, Mustipalli and Chinna Bonala with r
Jinka Chinna Tirupelaiah and others Vs. The Government of Andhra Pradesh and others
Raj Kumar and others Vs. Shakti Raj and others
Ramana Dayaram Shetty Vs. The International Airport Authority of India and others
The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission Vs. A.B. Natarajan and others
Manish Kumar Shahi Vs. State of Bihar and others
Tajvir Singh Sodhi and others Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir
Fuljit Kaur v. State of Punjab
The failure to conduct a fair and transparent selection process for Fair Price Shop Dealers, deviating from established guidelines, constitutes sufficient grounds for annulment of said selections.
The court established that recruitment processes must adhere strictly to applicable rules and directives, emphasizing the importance of lawful procedures in public employment.
The legitimacy of employment selections cannot be challenged solely based on familial relationships unless sinister motives or procedural violations are demonstrated.
The court established that recruitment processes must adhere to the legal framework in place at the time of vacancy and emphasized the necessity of public advertisement for fair selection.
Alteration of recruitment standards post-process violates constitutional fairness prohibitions under Articles 14 and 16.
Recruitment criteria cannot be altered after the selection process begins, as it violates principles of fairness and predictability under public service law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.