SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Cal) 719

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
ARIJIT BANERJEE, J. 
Ghosh & Roy Co. - Appellant
Versus
A-One Enterprise & Ors. – Respondents
MAT 1894 of 2025, IA No. CAN 1 of 2025 
Decided On : 28-11-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Joydip Kar, Sr. Adv., Mr. Sagar Bandyopadhyay, Sr. Adv., Ms. Soma Kar Ghosh, Adv., Ms. Shilpi Ghosh, Adv., Ms. Suparna Paul, Adv.
For the Respondents: Mr. Abhratosh Majumder, Sr. Adv., Mr. Arjun Roy Mukherjee, Adv., Ms. Saheli Mukherjee, Adv., Ms. Kousheyo Roy, Adv., Mr. Joyjeev Medhi, Adv., Mr. Swapan Kr. Dutta, Ld. G.P., Mr. Niloptal Chatterjee, Adv., Mr. Amritalal Chatterjee, Adv.

Judicial review in tender matters requires restraint, emphasizing compliance with the tendering authority’s interpretation unless clear evidence of wrongfulness is established.

Headnote:(A) Relevant Laws - The principles of judicial review in tender matters established in judicial precedents including Tata Cellular v. Union of India and Jagdish Mandal v. State of Orissa are invoked. (Paras 22-34)

(B) Tender Compliance - The court discussed requirements for bidding as outlined in tender clauses including the necessity for separately indicating costs for raw materials and service charges. (Paras 5, 36)

(C) Judicial Restraint - The court emphasized the limited scope of judicial review over administrative decisions in tender matters, affirming that decisions should not be interfered with unless arbitrary or irrational. (Paras 24, 30)

Facts of the case:
The case involves a challenge to the tender process for supplying diets at a hospital, initiated by A-One against Ghosh & Roy Co. after a draw of lots determined GRC as the successful bidder. A-One alleged irregularities in GRC's bid.

Findings of Court:
The Single Judge's order was overturned; GRC's bid was valid, and the authorities must follow proper procedures outlined in the tender documents.

Issues: Whether GRC's bid conformed to tender requirements and if the learned Judge was justified in his decision.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reiterated that the interpretation of tender documents should rest with the tendering authority unless there is clear evidence of arbitrariness or malice. The essential legality and procedural compliance of decisions should be maintained.

Result: Appeal allowed; GRC's bid sustained.

Table of Content
1. challenge of the judgment and order. (Para 1 , 2)
2. tender conditions related to financial bids. (Para 3)
3. previous writ petitions and related issues. (Para 4 , 5)
4. writ petition outcome regarding grc’s bid. (Para 6 , 7)
5. grc's arguments regarding the cooking gas cost. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
6. counterarguments presented by a-one. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
7. arguments regarding compliance of tender terms. (Para 19 , 20)
8. judicial review scope in tender matters. (Para 21 , 22 , 23)
9. principles governing judicial restraint in contract matters. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32)
10. conclusion on the procedural compliance. (Para 33 , 34 , 35)
11. assessment of bias and collusion allegations. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40)
12. final decision on appeal and implications. (Para 41 , 42)
13. order to set aside previous judgment. (Para 43 , 44 , 45)

JUDGMENT :

Arijit Banerjee, J.

1. A judgment and order dated October 27, 2025, passed by a learned Judge of our Court in WPA 16009 of 2024, being a writ petition filed by the respondent nos. 1 and 2 herein (in short ‘A-One’), is under challenge in this appeal at the instance of the respondent no. 6 in the writ petition, Ghosh & Roy Co. (in short ‘GRC’).

2. The disputes between the parties pertain to a tender floated by the Government of West Bengal, Office of the MPO-cum-Superintendent, ESI Hospital, Manicktala, Kolkata. It was an E-tender (Two Bid System) for “Patient Diet (indoor patients)” at the ESI Hospital Manicktala for 2023-24 and 2024-25. The invitation to E-tender was issued vide memo dated May 11, 2023.

3. The relevant terms and conditions of the tender are reproduced hereunder:-

5. Financial Bids (i) The rate should be quoted for all categories of diets separately (Diet 01 to Diet 08) in the format and upload the same along with other documents.

(ii) In the interest of supplying quality Diet for indoor patients, the offered rate for raw materials should not be less than the rate calculated by the Office on the basis of the rate provided by West Bengal Agriculture Marketing Board.

(iii) The cost of cooking gas has been fixed at Rs. 6.15/- per head per day.

(iv) The rate offered should be consolidated i.e., (a) cost of raw material (b) cost of cooking gas (c) service charge including profit and taxes if any.

26. From diet schedule, annexed herewith, it will be evident that a total of 8 (Eight) categories of diet along with scales are being maintained in the Hospital diet so constituted with a no. assigned to each dietary categories should preferably be supplied as follows:-

(i) Morning Tea - 7 a.m. to 7.30 a.m.

(ii) Breakfast - 8.30 a.m. to 9 a.m.

(iii) Lunch -11.30 a.m. to 12 Noon.

(iv) Afternoon Tea - 3.30 p.m. to 4 p.m.

(v) Dinner - 8 p.m. to 8.30 p.m.

FURNISHING OF RATES:-

a) Cost of raw materials :- The costs of raw materials have been acquired as per Wet Bengal Agricultural Marketing Board.

b) Cooking gas:- The cost of cooking gas will have to be shown separately for Tea, Breakfast, Lunch and Dinner for each category of diet.

c) Cost of Service charges including taxes, if any:- The cost of service charges including taxes, if any, will have to be shown separately for Tea, Breakfast, Lunch and Dinner for each category of diet.

(d) Finally, consolidated rate against each to be quoted taking together, (a+b+c) for the supply of each category of diet. The bidder has to fill up the Diet schedule of Diet – I to Diet-8 accordingly and upload it along with other documents for verification of the calculation done by the bidder, to come to a consolidated rate. The bidders can only put the consolidated rate of each category of Diet in the BOQ. If there is discrepancy between the rate uploaded and the rate quoted in the Diet schedule, then the bid will be liable for rejection. Rates must be quoted against each category of diet and each scale of diet and not in a single category of diet should be left un-quoted. The bid will be cancelled, if the bidder does not

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top