IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Soumen Sen, Apurba Sinha Ray, JJ.
Jakir Hossain Mondal & Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
The State of West Bengal & Ors. – Respondents
MAT 1113 of 2025, MAT 1114 of 2025, MAT 1135 of 2025, MAT 1162 of 2025, CAN 1 of 2025
Decided On : 10-09-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of grievances against wbmsc judgment. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. detailing the history of recruitment processes. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. commission's actions concerning recruitment legality. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. supreme court's rulings affecting recruitment process dynamics. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. commission's failure to meet recruitment deadlines. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 6. arguments regarding eligibility and procedural fairness. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 7. challenge to commission's decision to conduct re-exams. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 8. filing of subsequent writ petitions. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 9. intervenors' participation in the ongoing litigation. (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 10. legal reasoning against new written exams conducted. (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 11. arguments presented regarding the fairness of revised testing. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 12. commission's response to arguments against re-examination. (Para 52 , 53 , 54) |
| 13. fundamental issues regarding the recruitment process. (Para 108 , 111) |
| 14. judgment’s rationale surrounding the selection process. (Para 112 , 113 , 114) |
| 15. clarification on the observations and binding elements of judgments. (Para 117 , 118 , 120) |
JUDGMENT :
Soumen Sen, J.
1. The appellants are aggrieved by the common judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge on 16th July, 2025 whereby the challenge to the notices dated 5th August, 2024 and 9th August, 2024 issued by the West Bengal Madrasah Service Commission (in short 'WBMSC') had failed. The writ petitions were dismissed. Those writ petitions were heard along with the petitions filed by the interveners in this proceeding. The writ petitions filed by the interveners being WPA No.845 of 2025 and WPA No.1436 of 2025 before the learned Single Judge were allowed.
2. All the writ petitions were heard together and disposed of by the common judgment. In the writ petitions filed by the interveners the grievance was that the WBMSC was delaying the process in completing the recruitment process.
3. Before we advert to the submissions made on behalf of the WBMSC, we briefly narrate the facts which are as follows:
4. In or about 27th March, 2010, an advertisement was issued by the WBMSC in respect of the examination of 1st SLST (NT) Group-D. On 12th November, 2010, the Government of West Bengal Minority Affairs and Madrasah Education Department prepared and published a Rule, namely, West Bengal Madrasah Service Commission Recruitment (Selection and Recommendation of Persons for Appointment and Transfer to the post of Teacher & Non-Teaching Staff) Rules, 2010 (hereby referred to as 'Recruitment Rules, 2010'). The recruitment process for the 1st SLST was to be held in three sessions and 1,43,303 candidates participated in the said examination. On 29th May, 2011, the written examination was held for 26,445 candidates after they were successful in the preliminary screening examination. During the pendency of the said selection process, the writ petition being WP 20650(W) of 2013 was filed on 12th March, 2014 challenging some of the sections of the West Bengal Madrasah Service Commission Act, 2008. On 12th March, 2014, the learned Single Judge by a judgment declared Sections 8 , 10, 11 and 12 of the West Bengal Madrasah Service Commission Act, 2008 as ultra vires Article 30 of the Constitution of India as a result whereof the Commission was unable to proceed with the said recruitment process of Group-D posts of 1st SLST (NT), 2010. Thereafter, an appeal was preferred by the Commission being MAT 473 of 2014 and AST 130 of 2014. The Hon'ble Division Bench by the judgment and order dated 9th December, 2015 declared the entire Act of 2008 as unconstitutional. A Special Leave Petition was filed on 14th March, 2016 by a wait listed candidate of 5th SLST, 2011(AT) being SLP(C) No.6661 of 2016 in which an interim order was passed on 14th March, 2016 whereby the impugned final judgment and order was stayed. Thereafter, on 17th November, 2017 the Hon'ble Supreme Court permitted the West B
Sk. Mohd. Rafique Vs. Managing Committee, Contai Rahamania High Madrasah & Ors.
M/S Makhija Construction & Enggr. (P) Ltd. vs Indore Development Authority & Ors.
Kumaon Mandal Vikas Nigam Ltd vs Girja Shankar Pant & Ors.
Vikas Pratap Singh & Ors. v. State of Chhattisgarh & Ors.
Dinesh Kumar Kashyap & Ors. Vs. South East Central Railway & Ors.
Southern Petrochemical Industries Co. Ltd. -vs- Electricity Inspector & ETIO & Ors.
Arun Kumar Aggarwal v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.
Dadu Dayalu Mahasabha, Jaipur (Trust) v. Mahant Ram Niwas & Anr.
State of Gujarat & Ors. Vs. Utility Users' Welfare Association & Ors.
Ranjan Kumar & Ors. v. State of Bihar & Ors.
Hukum Chand Deswal v. Satish Raj Deswal
Ranjan Kumar v. State of Bihar
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. & Ors. v. Jharna Sarkar & Ors.
State of U.P. v. Brahm Datt Sharma
Union of India v. Major Bahadur Singh
Nair Service Society v. State of Kerala
Regional Manager v Pawan Kumar Dubey
The court upheld the Commission’s authority to conduct a second written examination to rectify previous evaluation errors, affirming the necessity for fair recruitment practices.
Selection into Judicial Service – Disclosure of marks in main examination before it is finalised and viva-voce conducted, would be against principles of transparency, rather it will invite criticism ....
Public Service Commission - Civil service Examination - Public Service Commission have no power to relax the recruitment norms - Public Service Commission have no power to relax the recruitment norms
The court held that procedural discrepancies and allegations, without substantial evidence of bias or systemic failure, do not merit interference with the integrity of the examination process.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.