IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
HARISH TANDON, PRASENJIT BISWAS
Mitali Kar (Sarkar) – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
judgment :
Prasenjit Biswas, J.
1. The Key issue involved in this appeal is whether the learned Single Bench of this Court was justified in allowing the application for condonation of delay subject to payment of cost of Rs. 50,000/-.
2. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned order passed by the learned Single Bench of this Court dated 14.12.2023 in connection with W.P.A 19320 of 2010 the present appellant has preferred this instant appeal.
3. Mr. Biswarup Biswas learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submitted that the learned Single Judge erred in law in allowing the application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act with a prayer for condonation of delay on condition of payment of cost of Rs. 50,000/- without going into the merits of the case of this appellant. It is further submitted that the Single Bench was not justified in imposing the cost of Rs. 50,000/- to the appellant for allowing the application for condonation of delay filed in connection with recalling the order of dismissal of the writ application dated 18.08.2017. As per submission of the learned Counsel the present appellant is not at all negligent in persuading the case which was pending
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the law of limitation is substantive, and exceptions for condoning delay should be exercised discreetly based on genuine and acceptable reason....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.