Back
SANJAY K. AGRAWAL, SANJAY S. AGRAWAL
Imtiyaj Ansari @ Kalu S/o Kalim Ansari – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANJAY K. AGRAWAL, J.
1. Since these two criminal appeals have arisen out of the common impugned judgment dated 18.12.2015 passed by the Sessions Judge, Session at Jashpur, Chhattisgarh in Sessions Trial No. 21/2014, they have been clubbed together, heard together and are being decided by this common judgment.
2. The sole appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 543 of 2016 namely Imtiyaj Ansari @ Kalu (A-1) and the sole appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 71 of 2016 namely Ravitosh Toppo (A-2); both have preferred these two appeals under Section 374(2) of the CrPC, calling in question the validity, legality and correctness of the impugned judgment, whereby both have been convicted and sentenced as under:
| Conviction (both the appellants) | Sentence (both the appellants) |
| Under Section 364 (A) of the IPC | Imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs. 50,000/- in default of payment of fine, additional rigorous imprisonment for 2 years |
| Under Section 507 of the IPC | Rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay fine amount of Rs. 10,000/- in default of payment of f |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
