Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
RAMESH SINHA, CJ., BIBHU DATTA GURU
Saroj Kshemanidhi (V.I.H. Candidate) S/o Shri Kshemanidhi – Appellant
Versus
Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission Raipur – Respondent
Order on Board
Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
1. I. A. No.3/2025 , application filed by Vijay Kumar Deshmukh, Advocate for withdrawal of his power as the appellant himself wants to argue the matter.
2. On due consideration and for the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and the appellant is permitted to argue the matter in person.
3. Heard Mr. Saroj Kshemanidhi, Appellant in Person. Also heard Mr.Y.S. Thakur, learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondent/ State as well as Mr. Anand Mohan Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondent No.1/ CGPSC.
4. The present writ appeal has been preferred by the appellant against the order dated 09.06.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in WPS No.1329/2021 (Saroj Kshemanidhi vs. Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission, Raipur & Anr.), whereby the learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition.
5. The appellant/writ petitioner preferred the writ petition by contending that on 23.1.201, respondent No. 1/Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission (for short “the CGPSC”) issued an advertisement for total 1384 posts for Assistant Professor including 184 posts for commerce subject. The date for submis
Court upheld the prerogative of the appropriate government in reserving posts for disabled candidates as per the Act, asserting that judicial intervention in recruitment processes must be limited and....
Candidates do not have a vested right to insist on the completion of a recruitment process if it is cancelled based on valid reasons, including changes in qualifications and reservation policies.
The Court emphasized that physically disabled individuals constitute a unique category entitled to equal treatment without further classification such as caste or religion, mandating adherence to mer....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of Section 33 of the Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995, regarding the reservation of posts for physically c....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
