SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Del) 558

SAT PAL
SILVERTOE MANUFACTURING COMPANY OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
USHA SOI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ANURADHA MAHAJAN, I.S.MATHUR, K.L.ARYA, RAJESH GOEL, SVARAN MAHAJAN

Sat Pal, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition has been filed by M/s. Silvertoe Manufacturing Company (hereinafter referred to as the tenant) and Smt. Parkash Devi (hereinafter referred to as the petitioner No. 2) under Section 25-B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (in short the Act) against the order dated 24th November, 1992 passed by Shri K. S. Khurana, Additional Rent Controller, Delhi whereby the learned Additional Rent Controller executed the eviction petition filed by Smt. Usha Soi (hereinafter referred to as the landlady) under Section 14 (1) (e) of the Act and passed the eviction order against the tenant and petitioner No. 2.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated, the facts of the case are that the landlady who is the owner/landlady of the premises bearing No. G-14, Maharani Bagh, New Delhi had let out the first floor of the. said house consisting of drawing-cum-dining room, three bed rooms with bath rooms and two dressing rooms, kitchen, pantry, verandahs and one bed room (on the terrace barasati floor) with bath room, two servant quarters and one garage as shown in the site plan filed alongwith the petition to the tenant for residential purpose of petitioner No. 2 who at the relevant time was th



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top