PRATHIBA M. SINGH
Manashwy Jha – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. - This hearing has been done by video conferencing.
2. The present petition has been filed by an advocate, who is a practicing lawyer before the High Court. The reliefs sought in the petition are two-fold. Firstly, there should be a mechanism for vaccination of lawyers, who are enrolled with the Bar Council of Delhi (hereinafter, BCD ) and who are members of the Delhi High Court Bar Association (hereinafter, DHCBA ). Secondly, that until the vaccination process of all lawyers is completed, the impugned notifications dated 20th February, 2021 relating to the physical functioning of the Delhi High Court and Subordinate Courts ought to be suspended.
3. Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, Mr. A.S. Chandiok, Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Mr. Ramji Srinivasan, Ms. Geeta Luthra, Sr. Advocates, Mr. Atul Nagarajan, Mr. Manish Vashisht, Mr. Kirtiman Singh, Mr. Jeevesh Nagrath, Mr. Nikhil Rohtagi, Mr. Sachit Jolly, Ms. Amrita Sharma, Mr. Amit Kr. Hajely, Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocates are some of the Sr. Counsels and Counsels who have made their submissions supporting the Petition. Ms. Kajal Chandra, ld. counsel has appeared for the Delhi High Court Bar Association and Mr. Jayant K. Mehta, ld. Co
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.