DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Anil Kumar Hajelay – Appellant
Versus
Honble High Court of Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition for hybrid hearings due to covid-19. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. consideration for hybrid hearing by dhcba. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court observations on the procedural stance. (Para 6 , 11 , 14) |
| 4. arguments on the necessity of physical hearings and vaccinations. (Para 9 , 10 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. continuation of interim relief on adverse orders. (Para 15) |
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh (Oral)--This hearing has been done through video conferencing.
2. The Petitioners in WP(C)2018/2021 are practising lawyers who are all Senior citizens. The prayer in the petition is that the Subordinate Courts and Quasi-Judicial bodies in Delhi ought to be directed to hold hybrid hearings, once physical courts are opened, as there are several counsels who suffer from co-morbidities and are unable to appear before the Court due to the threat of the Covid-19 pandemic. The Petitioners also submit that adverse orders are being passed by the subordinate courts if the lawyers do not appear physically and therefore enormous prejudice is being caused. On 16th February 2021, a report was called for from the worthy Registrar General as to availability of infrastructure in the subordinate courts including availabili
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.