SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Anil Kumar Hajelay – Appellant
Versus
Honble High Court of Delhi – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petition for hybrid hearings due to covid-19. (Para 2 , 3)
2. consideration for hybrid hearing by dhcba. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court observations on the procedural stance. (Para 6 , 11 , 14)
4. arguments on the necessity of physical hearings and vaccinations. (Para 9 , 10 , 12 , 13)
5. continuation of interim relief on adverse orders. (Para 15)

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh (Oral)--This hearing has been done through video conferencing.

2. The Petitioners in WP(C)2018/2021 are practising lawyers who are all Senior citizens. The prayer in the petition is that the Subordinate Courts and Quasi-Judicial bodies in Delhi ought to be directed to hold hybrid hearings, once physical courts are opened, as there are several counsels who suffer from co-morbidities and are unable to appear before the Court due to the threat of the Covid-19 pandemic. The Petitioners also submit that adverse orders are being passed by the subordinate courts if the lawyers do not appear physically and therefore enormous prejudice is being caused. On 16th February 2021, a report was called for from the worthy Registrar General as to availability of infrastructure in the subordinate courts including availabili

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top