JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. - Rc.Rev. 599/2018 & CM APPLN. 52211/2018, 52213/2018, 13763/2019, 14710/2019, 22274/2019, 29718/2019, 13291/2020, 15856/2020, 15858/2020 & 18719-20/2020 & RC.REV. 129/2020

1. Petitioner in RC.REV. 599/2018 (i.e. Respondent No. 1 in the Eviction Petition) is the Tenant in the tenanted property and impugns order dated 09.07.2018 passed by the Rent Controller, dismissing the application for grant of leave to defend the Eviction Petition filed by Respondents 1 & 2 therein (i.e. Petitioners in the Eviction Petition).

2. Petitioner in RC.REV. 129/2020 (i.e. Respondent No. 2 in the Eviction Petition) is a co-owner of the subject property and impugns order dated 09.07.2018 passed by the Rent Controller to the limited extent that the Tenant has been directed to deliver possession of the tenanted premises exclusively to Respondent No. 2 & 3 (i.e. the EVICTION PETITIONERS).

3. For the sake of convenience Petitioner in RC.REV. 599/2018 (also the Respondent No. 1 in RC.REV. 129/2020) shall be referred to as the TENANT. Petitioner in RC.REV. 129/2020 (also the Respondent No. 3 in RC.REV. 599/2018) shall be referred to as the CO-OWNER. Respondent No. 1 & 2 in RC.REV. 5