Back
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI
Anil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State (Govt. Of Nct Delhi) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction under ipc 302 for murder. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of the prosecution's case and evidence gathered. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. arguments for the defense and state. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. court's analysis of witness testimonies. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. context on characterization of witnesses and related laws. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. analysis of evidence concerning the weapon's recovery. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 7. discussion on intent and degree of culpable homicide. (Para 27 , 28) |
| 8. legal distinctions between murder and culpable homicide. (Para 29 , 30) |
| 9. final upholding of conviction and sentencing. (Para 34 , 35 , 36) |
JUDGMENT
Siddharth Mridul, J. - The present appeal preferred under the provision of Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter 'Cr.P.C.') assails the Judgment of Conviction dated 12.09.2018 and Sentencing Order dated 03.10.2018 passed by Ld. ASJ-02, Sh. Poonam Chaudhry, (Central) District Court, Delhi, emanating from FIR No. 33/2012 registered at P.S.: Subzi Mandi, whereby the appellant was convicted for the offence under Section 302 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 ('IPC') in Sessions Case No. 27265
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
