Back
PRATHIBA M. SINGH
Neeta Bhardwaj – Appellant
Versus
Kamlesh Sharma – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. - This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. These matters pertain to the Kalkaji Mandir, which this Court has been hearing from time to time. These are part-heard matters.
3. Vide previous order dated 22nd March, 2022, eviction of unauthorized occupants of jhuggis and occupants of dharamshalas was directed, and directions were also issued for allocation of temporary tables for shops to be set up during the Navratra period. Pursuant to the said order, this Court has been informed that an SLP being SLP No.9073/2022 titled Nathi Ram Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. was preferred by some occupants of dharamshalas challenging the order dated 27th September, 2021, and subsequent orders passed in the present appeal. In the said SLP, the Supreme Court vide order dated 25th March, 2022, has directed as under:
'1. Permission to file the Special Leave Petitions granted.
2. We are not inclined to entertain the Special Leave Petitions under article 136 of the Constitution. The Special Leave Petitions are accordingly dismissed.
3. We grant liberty to the petitioners to move the administrator appointed by the High Court with their grievances. It would be
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to order the eviction of unauthorized occupants and the allocation of temporary spaces for commercial activities in the Kalka....
Court upheld the necessity of lawful eviction of unauthorized occupants to ensure redevelopment while facilitating temporary arrangements for vendors during religious events.
The court established that unlawful occupants of public premises must be evicted for safety during religious gatherings, ensuring proper relocation options are provided yet not favoring unauthorized ....
The court ruled on the necessity of redevelopment of temple premises while ensuring the rights of pujaris and addressing grievances of unauthorized occupants.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to regulate and manage the premises of the Kalkaji Mandir, including the fixation of tehbazari amounts for shops and the appo....
Court upheld the importance of managing and redeveloping temple premises while balancing the interests of stakeholders involved, ensuring proper representation and administration of the site.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the necessity of accommodating the interests of pujaris and baridaars in the redevelopment process and ensuring their active participation.
Court ensures participatory redevelopment process for community stakeholders while directing eviction of unauthorized occupants and considering rehabilitation under public housing schemes.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for ongoing progress in the demarcation process, proper placement of street vendors, resolution of redevelopment issues, and conducting a ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
