IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
Kamlesh Sharma – Respondent
FAO 36 of 2021 & CM APPLs.2914 of 2021, 10442 of 2021, 10444 of 2021, 20904 of 2021, 23819 of 2021, 25868 of 2021, 25869 of 2021, 25870 of 2021, 25884 of 2021, 25885 of 2021, 26495 of 2021, 29121 of 2021, 38063 of 2021, 38289 of 2021, 39643 of 2021, 43944-46 of 2021, 3172 of 2022, 3455 of 2022, 5641 of 2022, 5642 of 2022, 5803 of 2022, 5865 of 2022, 7745 of 2022, 13472 of 2022, 16153 of 2022, 17039 of 2022, 18207 of 2022, 18247 of 2022, 18248 of 2022, 21768 of 2022, 21801 of 2022, 21802 of 2022, 21803 of 2022, 22125 of 2022, 23093 of 2022, 29624 of 2022, 32296 of 2022, 34552 of 2022, 34553 of 2022, 39754-55 of 2022, 40548 of 2022, 43723 of 2022, 53179 of 2022, 876 of 2023 with With CM (M) 323 of 2021 & CM APPL. 14178 of 2021, 20945 of 2021, 20949 of 2021, 40269 of 2021, CONT.CAS(C) 614 of 2021, RFA 413 of 2021, CS (OS) 2499 of 2010, CS (OS) 511 of 2021, CS (OS) 526 of 2021 & I.A. 7511 of 2022, CS (OS) 527 of 2021 & I.As.1717-18 of 2022, CS (OS) 533 of 2021 & I.As.1721-22 of 2022, CS (OS) 535 of 2021 & I.A. 7552 of 2022, CS (OS) 538 of 2021 & I.As.1725-26 of 2022, CS (OS) 539 of 2021 & I.As. 9063 of 2022, 9064 of 2022, CS (OS) 540 of 2021 & I.A. 7940 of 2022, CS (OS) 541 of 2021 & I.As.1723-24 of 2022, CS (OS) 542 of 2021 & I.As. 9031 of 2022, 9032 of 2022, CS (OS) 544 of 2021 & I.As.1719-20 of 2022, CS (OS) 545 of 2021, CS (OS) 547 of 2021 & I.As.1715-16 of 2022, CS (OS) 554 of 2021 & I.As. 9061 of 2022, 9062 of 2022, CS (OS) 579 of 2021 & I.As. 9981 of 2022, 9982 of 2022, CS (OS) 55 of 2022, I.As.12299 of 2022, 12300 of 2022, 12341-42 of 2022,
Decided On : 15-03-2023
Mandir Premises - Kalkaji Mandir - [Supreme Court order dated 09.01.2023, Supreme Court order dated 25.03.2022, Order dated 9th December, 2021, Order dated 21st December, 2021, Order dated 9th September, 2022] - The court discussed the demarcation of mandir premises, redevelopment of the mandir, removal of street vendors, removal of unauthorized occupants, allotment of temporary shops, and arrangements for Navratras. The key legal provisions discussed include the directions of the Supreme Court, the appointment of an Administrator, and the fixation of tehbazari amounts for shops. The court's decision was influenced by the need to regulate the mandir premises, ensure orderly access for devotees, and manage the Navratra period effectively.
Fact of the Case:
The court discussed various matters related to the Kalkaji Mandir, including demarcation of premises, redevelopment, removal of street vendors and unauthorized occupants, allotment of temporary shops, and arrangements for Navratras.
Finding of the Court:
The court made various findings related to the ongoing issues at the Kalkaji Mandir, including the need for demarcation, finalization of division of work for redevelopment, submission of representations by street vendors, removal of unauthorized occupants, cancellation of allotments for non-payment of tehbazari, and arrangements for the Navratra period.
Issues: The issues discussed by the court included the progress of demarcation, division of work for redevelopment, status of street vendors, eviction of unauthorized occupants, cancellation of allotments, and arrangements for the Navratra period.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the need to regulate the mandir premises, ensure orderly access for devotees, and manage the Navratra period effectively.
Final Decision: The court directed various actions, including the presence of the SDM-Kalkaji for demarcation, finalization of division of work for redevelopment, submission of representations by street vendors, removal of unauthorized occupants, cancellation of allotments for non-payment of tehbazari, and arrangements for the Navratra period.
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. These matters pertain to the Kalkaji Mandir, which this Court has been hearing from time to time. These are part-heard matters.
Demarcation of Mandir Premises
3. On 22nd February, 2023, the Court was informed during the hearing by the SDM- Kalkaji's Office that a tender was floated for carrying out demarcation through a TSM agency for the survey of the premises and the same was to be finalised shortly. In view of the said submission, the Court had directed the SDM's Office to place a report in respect of the demarcation on record by the next date of hearing.
4. None has appeared on behalf of the SDM-Kalkaji today and no report in relation to demarcation has been filed.
5. Mr. J.B. Kapil, SDM-Kalkaji shall be personally present in Court on the next date of hearing and update the Court on the demarcation process as the Court has been informed by ld. Counsel for the Administrator, that there has been no further progress as the tender did not yield any response.
6. SDM-Kalkaji shall also collect from ld. Counsel for the parties, as also any other parties, the details of the demarcation done in 2012 by M/s Dhyani Constructions and make his submissions before the Court in respect of demarcation of the mandir premises on the next date of hearing.
7. Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Inspector, who has joined the hearing virtually, has been informed of this order. The SHO-Kalkaji shall serve a copy of today's order to the SDM-Kalkaji so that he can remain present on the next date of hearing.
Redevelopment of the Mandir
8. A status report dated 14th March, 2023 has been placed on record by the ld. Administrator. As per the report, a meeting between the two Architects - Mr. Goonmeet Singh Chauhan and Ms. Himanshi Kaushik as also the ld. Administrator, and the pujaris took place on 10th March 2023. It is informed that a proposal for division of responsibility between the architects was proposed by Mr. Chauhan on which the pujaris are yet to revert.
9. Mr. Chauhan and Ms. Himanshi Kaushik, both the architects are present in the Court. They submit that within a period of four weeks, they will finalise the division of work between themselves and place the same on record.
10. The division of work will be placed on record by means of a table/chart by the next date of hearing. For the said purpose, if any further meetings are required, the same shall be coordinated by the two architects irrespective of the presence of the parties. The meetings shall be held between the architects and the final agreed plan shall be put up.
Removal of street vendors from the periphery of the Mandir
11. Insofar as the 51 street vendors registered with the MCD vending on the periphery of the Kalkaji Mandir who were directed to be moved from the periphery of the Kalkaji mandir vide order dated 14th February, 2023 are concerned, they have already been moved to the western side of Shamshan Ghat Road, Kalkaji as recorded in order dated 22nd February, 2023. On the last date of hearing, the Court was informed that more street vendors are there who are also stated to be registered with the MCD. In view of the said submission, the Court had passed the following direction:
"15. If that is the position, the said 28 street vendors, or any other vendors claiming parity with the 51 street vendors registered with the SDMC, may appear before the Id. Administrator on 5th March, 2023 (Sunday) on which date, concerned officials from the SDMC shall also clarify the position to the Id. Administrator who shall put up a report on the next date of hearing after taking all the relevant factors into consideration."
12. Today, Ms. Samapika Biswal, ld. Counsel, has informed the Court that in the meeting dated 05th March, 2023, which was also attended by MCD Officials, the street vendors were given time till 9th March, 2023 to submit their representations along with relevant documents. It is her submission tha
AI
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to regulate and manage the premises of the Kalkaji Mandir, including the fixation of tehbazari amounts for shops and the appo....
The court emphasized the importance of ensuring the safety and security of devotees by removing unauthorized encroachments and managing the crowd during religious festivals.
The Court reinforced the importance of regulated tehbazari for authorized shops, ensuring safety and preventing unauthorized hawking during religious events.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for ongoing progress in the demarcation process, proper placement of street vendors, resolution of redevelopment issues, and conducting a ....
Court upheld the importance of managing and redeveloping temple premises while balancing the interests of stakeholders involved, ensuring proper representation and administration of the site.
Court upheld the necessity of lawful eviction of unauthorized occupants to ensure redevelopment while facilitating temporary arrangements for vendors during religious events.
The court established that unlawful occupants of public premises must be evicted for safety during religious gatherings, ensuring proper relocation options are provided yet not favoring unauthorized ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to order the eviction of unauthorized occupants and the allocation of temporary spaces for commercial activities in the Kalka....
Court emphasized the authority of the Administrator in managing religious premises, focusing on the removal of unauthorized occupants and the proper structuring of redevelopment plans.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.