Neeta Bhardwaj vs Kamlesh Sharma

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Del) 818

PRATHIBA M. SINGH
Neeta Bhardwaj – Appellant
Versus
Kamlesh Sharma – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Arun Birbal, Mr. Sanjay Singh & Ms. Sonia Singhania, Advocates, for DDA.
Mr. Neeraj Bhardwaj & Mr. Rahul Bhardwaj, Advocates.
Mr. Lokesh Bhardwaj, Advocate.
Mr. Kush Bhardwaj, Advocate.
Ms. Samapika Biswal and Mr. Aman Kumar Yadav, Advocates, for Ld. Administrator.
Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Amicus
Mr. Luv Bhardwaj, Advocate.
Mr. Siddharth Panda and Mr. Ritank, Advocates for SDMC.
Mr. Thakur Sumit, Advocate.
Mr. Vishal Bhardwaj, Advocate.
Mr. Ishkaran Singh, Advocate for 19 shopkeepers.
Mr. Paul Kumar Kalai and Mr. Kaoliangpov Kamei, Advocates, for Petitioner.
Mr Prabhas Chandra, Advocate.
Mr. R.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate.
Mr. Rajmangal Kumar.
Mr. Goonmeet Singh, Architect.
Mr. Rakesh Kumar, SHO.
Mr.Rajeev Kumar Chauhan, Advocate, for Unregistered Vendors.
Ms. Himanshi Kaushik, Architect.
Mr. S. Sasibhushan, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. These matters pertain to the Kalkaji Mandir, which this Court has been hearing from time to time. These are part-heard matters.

Demarcation of Mandir Premises

3. On 22nd February, 2023, the Court was informed during the hearing by the SDM- Kalkaji's Office that a tender was floated for carrying out demarcation through a TSM agency for the survey of the premises and the same was to be finalised shortly. In view of the said submission, the Court had directed the SDM's Office to place a report in respect of the demarcation on record by the next date of hearing.

4. None has appeared on behalf of the SDM-Kalkaji today and no report in relation to demarcation has been filed.

5. Mr. J.B. Kapil, SDM-Kalkaji shall be personally present in Court on the next date of hearing and update the Court on the demarcation process as the Court has been informed by ld. Counsel for the Administrator, that there has been no further progress as the tender did not yield any response.

6. SDM-Kalkaji shall also collect from ld. Counsel for the parties, as also any other parties, the details of the demarcation done