IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Chandra Dhari Singh, J.
Surender Singh Rawat - Appellant
Versus
Jamia Milia Islamia University - Respondent
W.P.(C) 1453 of 2014
Decided On : 18-11-2022
Mandamus - Recognition of Sports Coach as Teacher - Societies Registration Act, 1860, Jamia Millia Islamia Act, 1988 - [Societies Registration Act, 1860, Jamia Millia Islamia Act, 1988]
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a Sports Coach, sought recognition as a teacher and entitlement to teacher benefits from the Respondent University. The Respondent denied the claim, citing the distinction between the roles of Sports Coach and teacher, and the lack of statutory provisions for considering a Sports Coach as a teacher.
Finding of the Court:
The Court found that the petitioner's role as a Sports Coach did not meet the criteria for being considered a teacher as per the governing Act and ordinances of the Respondent University. The Court also noted the petitioner's delayed pursuit of the claim and dismissed the petition.
Issues: Recognition of Sports Coach as Teacher, Entitlement to Teacher Benefits
Ratio Decidendi: The principle of equal pay for equal work applies only when the positions are functionally and structurally identical. The Act and ordinances of the Respondent University did not provide for considering a Sports Coach as a teacher. The petitioner's delayed pursuit of the claim was also considered.
Final Decision: The petition was dismissed, and the reliefs claimed were not allowed.
JUDGMENT
Chandra Dhari Singh, J. - The instant petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:
'i) Issue a writ of Mandamus or a writ in the form of Mandamus commanding/directing the Respondent to recognize and grant the status of a Teacher to the petitioner with all seniority and also to pay and release his monthly salary/other emoluments for the entire period from the date of initial appointment as per the timely recommendations of the Pay Commission.
ii) Award cost for this Petition with the further request to pass any other order(s) or direction(s) or grant any other relief(s) as deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the facts of the case.'
FACTUAL MATRIX
2. Respondent was a registered society under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, named as 'Jamia Millia Islamia Society, Delhi' which vide the Jamia Millia Islamia Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') was dissolved and all properties and rights of the said Society stood transferred and vested in the said University being incorporated and established named as the 'Jamia Millia Islamia' (hereinafter referred to as the 'Respondent University/JMI').
3. At present, the respondent university is a Central University and primarily governed by the said Act and the statutes therein and is fully funded by the University Grants Commission (hereinafter referred to as the 'UGC').
4. Petitioner was engaged by the Respondent University for rendering his services as a Sports Coach by way of Agreement dated 20.11.1987 and vide office communication dated 22.06.1990, his services were confirmed and he was duly appointed with effect from 17.12.1988.
5. It has been contended in the petition that representations were made by the petitioner to the respondent from time to time i.e., on 06.05.2008 and 30.03.2012 to grant him the status of a teacher and to treat him at par inter alia in terms of payment of salary and emoluments as per the pay scale of teacher.
6. The petitioner being a Sports Coach is thus aggrieved by not being considered at par with teacher and has approached this court by way of the instant petition praying for being considered as a teacher and for receiving all the emoluments that a teacher is entitled to.
SUBMISSIONS Petitioner's Submissions
7. Mr. Mayank Wadhwa, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was put into services by the erstwhile society of Respondent University under Agreement dated 20.11.1987 as Jamia Teacher with the basic pay scale of Rs. l400-40-1600-50-2300-EB-60-2600 per month excluding usual allowances at the rates admissible under the Rules of Jamia Employees. It is submitted that upon the completion of probation period, vide office communication dated 22.06.1990, the services of the petitioner were confirmed and he was duly appointed with effect from 17.12.1988.
8. It is further stated that the Respondent University, being biased against the petitioner, started categorising the petitioner as Sports Coach only and not as a whole-time teacher, which was completely in violation of appointment terms. The Respondent University also started paying the monthly salary which was not at par with the entitlement of a teacher according to the Rules and also contrary to the recommendations of the Pay Commissions.
9. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that under the provisions of the Act, the petitioner is entitled to being treated at par with a teacher and the same pay and emoluments.
10. It is submitted that the petitioner made representations dated 06.05.2008, and 30.03.2012 to treat him as teacher and also for being granted the revised pay scale, both of which remained unattended.
11. It is submitted that the petitioner has also furnished a circular No.9-12/91-U.F.I. dated 24.09.1992 from the office of the Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development (Department of Education) furnishing the decision that the Sports
AI
The principle of equal pay for equal work applies only when the positions are functionally and structurally identical.
An employee performing instructional and training duties, such as a sports coach, qualifies as a 'teacher' under the Act and Statutes if their role involves imparting skills and guidance, regardless ....
Definition of “teacher” is inclusive in nature and not just confined to a Professor, Associate Professor or Assistant Professor – Word “teacher” encompasses one who is enjoined to impart instructions....
A Physical Training Instructor, classified as academic staff under amended bylaws, is entitled to Career Advancement Scheme benefits despite prior designation as non-teaching, based on continuity of ....
Physical education directors are categorized as non-teaching staff under University Ordinances, retaining a superannuation age of 62, despite claims of being treated as teachers for benefit purposes.
The court established that a Senior Research Officer is classified as a Teacher under the university's statutes, entitled to benefits of extended service age.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.