SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 592

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
AMIT SHARMA, J.
Mohammad Saber - Petitioner
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi - Respondent
Bail Appln. No. 86 of 2023
Decided On : 25-04-2023

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, Mr. Kunal Sachdeva & Ms. Srishti Bajpai, Mr. Aman Usman, APP with Insp. Mintu Singh Gautam.

Headnote:(A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Sections 436A and 439 - Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3 and 9 - Bail application - The applicant has been in judicial custody for over 7 years, exceeding half the maximum sentence of 14 years prescribed for the crimes charged - The court must consider the delay in trial, which cannot be attributed to the applicant - The prosecution failed to provide substantial evidence directly linking the applicant to the charges, relying mainly on disclosures from co-accused, which lack corroboration - As the applicant is entitled to bail under section 436A and has met the requirements for its grant, the court mandates his release on bail with conditions. (Paras 3, 24, 36, and 34)

Table of Content
1. factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2)
2. details on the allegations and evidence. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
3. discussion on the law in relation to the case. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
4. judicial reasoning on the application of section 436a of the crpc. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32)
5. final decision on bail and its conditions. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38)

JUDGMENT :

Amit Sharma, J.

This is the second application under Section 439 read with Section 436A of the CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE , 1973 (‘CrPC’) seeking grant of regular bail in case FIR No. 166/2015, dated 16.11.2015., under Sections 3 and 9 of the OFFICIAL SECRETS ACT , 1923, registered at P.S. Crime Branch. The first application filed on behalf of the present applicant (BAIL APPLN. 1625/2017) was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 31.02.2018. passed by a coordinate bench of this Court, with a direction to the learned trial Court to expedite the trial.

2. Briefly stated, the facts of the present case, as alleged in the chargesheet are as under:

    i. Secret information was received at P.S. Crime Branch regarding alleged anti-national activities supported by Pakistan based intelligence operatives. The said operative had an Indian handler, who collected information regarding deployment of Indian Army and Border Security Force (‘BSF’) in Jammu & Kashmir and passed the same to persons across the border, thereby endangering national security. The aforesaid handler had a Pan-India network of informers which compromised of security personnel as well.

    ii. The mobile numbers involved were intercepted and based on important intercepts, names of two persons involved - Kafaitullah Khan and Abdul Rasheed were surfaced. Kafaitullah Khan was based in Rajouri District of Jammu & Kashmir and Abdul Rasheed served in the BSF. It was revealed that Abdul Rasheed passed on secret information to Kafaitullah Khan in lieu of money, who then passed on the same to Pakistan intelligence operatives.

    iii. Based on the said information, the present FIR was registered against both Kafaitullah Khan and Abdul Rasheed under Sections 3 and 9 of the OFFICIAL SECRETS ACT , 1923.

    iv. During the course of investigation, information was received that Kafaitullah Khan was planning to travel somewhere from Manjakote and was going to Bhopal from Jammu via Delhi by the Malwa Express train. Based on the said information, Kafaitullah Khan was apprehended on 25.11.2015. at New Delhi Railway Station. During the search of his person, sensitive documents relating to Army were recovered. He was interrogated at the office of ISC, Crime Branch and he admitted to spying for Pakistan and also revealed the involvement of some security personnel. The mobile phone that he used for communicating with his associates was also recovered. His passport having details of his travel to Pakistan, alongwith a letter of recommendation from ‘Jammu Kashmir Freedom Movement Organisation’ requesting the Pakistan High Commission to issue a visa was also recovered. During interrogation, he revealed that he was working at the instance of one Faizal-ur-Rehman. He was formally arrested in the case on 26.11.2015..

    v. During his interrogation, he revealed that he was contacted by Faizalur-Rehman, who was a Pakistan intelligence operative, who asked him to work for Pakistan intelligence. Faizal-ur-Rehman had asked him to contact retired defence personnel and introduced them to the former. He revealed that in lieu of the work, Faizal-ur-Rehman had promised him to pay a handsome sum of money. Faizal-ur-Rehman had contacted Kafaitullah Khan on his mobile phone and asked to speak with some ex-servicemen, to which the latter replied that he was still trying to get in touch with them.

    vi. In the market, Kafaitullah Khan came across his close friend Mohamma

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top