Ved Prakash vs Directorate of Education

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Del) 1063

JYOTI SINGH
Ved Prakash – Appellant
Versus
Directorate of Education – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Nikhilesh Kumar, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Abinash K. Mishra, Advocate, for the Respondent-2 and 3.

JUDGMENT

Jyoti Singh, J. (Oral)--Present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:

"a) Issue a writ of mandamus, order or direction, directing the Respondent No. 2 & 3 to implement the speaking order dated 7.9.2022 passed by the Respondent No.1 and forthwith release the arrears along with interest;

b) Issue a writ of mandamus, order or direction, directing the Respondent No. 2 and 3 to release the arrears towards TA in terms of 6th & 7th CPC, arrears towards DA and balance salary of 40% for the period April 2020 to February 2021 along with interest;

c) pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case."

2. Petitioner was appointed as DTP Operator on 15.07.1996 and superannuated w.e.f. 31.08.2021. It is the case of the Petitioner that at the time of his retirement, the terminal/retiral benefits were not released to the Petitioner and even the arrears of pay revision under the 6th and 7th Pay Commissions have not been released to him.

3. Petitioner had earlier filed a writ petition being W.P.(C) No.12071/2021 in this Court, which was disposed of vide order dated 26.10.2021, directing Respon