SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 1436

RAJIV SHAKDHER, GIRISH KATHPALIA
Amit Jain – Appellant
Versus
Mahavir International Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr Pratap Singh Rawat, Advocate, for the Appellant.
Mr Mukul Kumar Baid, Advocate, for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]

Girish Kathpalia, J.

1. By way of this appeal, brought under the provisions of Order XLIII Rule 1 read with Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code (hereinafter referred to as "the Code") and Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act 2015 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), the appellant assailed order dated 11.11.2022 of learned District Judge (Commercial), South, Saket, Delhi, whereby application dated 05.11.2022 of the appellant plaintiff under Section 151 of the Code was treated as application under Order XXIII Rule 1(3) of the Code and disposed of, thereby permitting the appellant to withdraw the suit with liberty to file fresh suit, but declining the request of the appellant for return of the court fees. Upon service of notice of this appeal, the respondents entered appearance through counsel, who on 05.04.2023 submitted that the respondents have no objection to this appeal concerning the relief which has been denied to the appellant by the learned trial court. On 05.04.2023 itself, learned counsel for appellant was also called upon to address on maintainability of this appeal. Accordingly, we have heard learned cou

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top