VIKAS MAHAJAN
Neeraj Singal – Appellant
Versus
Directorate of Enforcement – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding violation of section 19 of pmla. (Para 5 , 11 , 17 , 19 , 23 , 27) |
| 3. court's observation on procedural compliance. (Para 6 , 12 , 35 , 46 , 48 , 60) |
| 4. key rulings from supreme court affecting the interpretation of arrest procedures. (Para 7 , 9 , 36) |
| 5. final ruling on the petitioner's request for relief. (Para 8) |
| 6. conclusion and dismissal of petitions. (Para 62 , 64) |
JUDGMENT
Vikas Mahajan, J. - The issue involved in the above two cases is inextricably intertwined, therefore, they are being disposed of by a common judgment.
2. CRL.M.C. 4376/2023 has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following relief:
"(i) Declare the arrest of the Petitioner being in gross violation of the settled tenets of law in Section 41A(3) Cr.PC;
(ii) Declare all consequential actions including the remand order(s) dated 10.06.2023 & 20.06.2023 passed by Ld. Duty judge/ Special CBI Judge as null and void;
(iii) That pending the hearing and final disposal of the present Petition, this Hon'ble Court be pleased to stay the Impugned Order(S) dated 10.06.2023 & 20.06.2023;
(iv) That pending the hearing and final disposal of the p
Pankaj Bansal vs. Union of India.
Ram Kishor Arora vs. Directorate of Enforcement
Abdul Jabar Butt and Another vs. State of Jammu & Kashmir
Durga Pada Ghosh vs. State of West Bengal
State of West Bengal vs. D.K. Basu
Ashok Sadarangani vs. Union of India
Aher Raja Khima v. State of Saurashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.