SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Prateek Jalan, J.
Pooja - Appellant
Versus
Ministry of Ayush - Respondent
W.P.(C) 3267 of 2021
Decided On : 29-07-2021




Court upheld the interpretation of admission guidelines, confirming eligibility of candidates who participated in earlier rounds for subsequent rounds in the counselling process.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Admission process for post-graduate courses in Ayurveda challenged - Petitioner claimed that 23 ineligible candidates were allowed to participate in counselling, affecting her chance of admission - The guidelines for counselling were interpreted by the court to not restrict participation based on the facts presented. (Paras 1-19)

(B) Administrative Law - Interpretation of FAQs regarding eligibility for counselling - The court found the Union's interpretation reasonable, clarifying that candidates admitted in earlier rounds may participate in subsequent rounds if seeking seat upgrades. (Paras 5-19)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, holding All-India Rank 2708 in the UR category, claimed injustice in the admission process, focusing on the participation of ineligible candidates in the third round of counselling. (Paras 2-3)

Findings of Court:
The petitioner's arguments were deemed unmerited, and the process of admission did not violate the stipulated conditions, as applicants were correctly informed regarding eligibility for the counselling rounds. (Paras 14-19)

Issues: Determining the eligibility of candidates in the counselling rounds and the interpretation of guidelines set forth by the Union concerning these admission processes. (Paras 3, 6, 15)

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Union's interpretation regarding eligibility for the third round of counselling was neither arbitrary nor unreasonable, allowing participation of candidates who could seek seat upgrades. (Paras 14-16)

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. challenging admission process for ayurveda courses. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. eligibility criteria for counselling rounds. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
3. interpretation of eligibility provisions is reasonable. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
4. petition dismissed, no grounds for interference. (Para 19)

JUDGMENT

Prateek Jalan, J. (Oral)--The proceedings in the matter have been conducted through video conferencing.

W.P.(C) 3267/2021 with CM APPL. 9949/2021 (for stay)

1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution concerns a challenge to the admission process for post-graduate courses in Ayurveda for the academic year 2020-21.

Facts

2. The petitioner completed an undergraduate degree in Ayurveda, and aspired for admission in post-graduate courses. For this purpose, she took the entrance examination held on 28.09.2020. The results of the examination were published on 04.11.2020. The petitioner obtained an All-India Rank of 2708 in the relevant category, being the Unreserved category ["UR category"]. All-India counselling was held in three rounds, with a fourth round of counselling by the States. The petitioner participated in all three rounds of counselling but, unfortunately, was not allotted a seat.

3. The grievance with which she has approached the Court is that 23 candidates were permitted to participate in the third/mop-up round of counselling, contrary to the stipulated eligibility conditions. Her contention is that, had the rules been properly followed, she may have been selected in the counselling process.

4. The petitioner therefore seeks the following relief:

    "(i) Direct the Respondents to allot one Post Graduation Seat in favour of the Petitioner under All India Ayush Post Graduate Entrance Test, 2020-21; and

    (ii) pass such other or further order as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."

Submissions of learned counsel

5. In support of the petition, Mr. Sarfraz Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner, relies upon the following answers given to the Frequently Asked Questions ["FAQs"] published by the respondent- Union of India ["the Union"] in respect of admission through the All India quota:-

    "Q.No.44. Who will be eligible for AACCC 03rd/Mop Up Round for Government, Government aided, Deemed Universities, Central Universities and National Institutes? Ans: The Following categories of candidates are eligible for 03rd/Mop Up Round

    a) Candidates who are registering for the first time.

    b) Candidates who have registered but not been allotted a seat in Round-1 & Round2.

    c) All candidates admitted in Round I or Round II and want to upgrade their admitted seats (with fresh choice filling).

    Q.No.45. Who will be in-eligible for AACCC 03rd/Mop Up Round for Government, Government aided, Deemed Universitie, Central Universities and National Institutes?

    Ans: The Following categories of candidates are in-eligible for 03rd/Mop Up Round:

    a) Candidates who have been allotted seat in Round 1 & 2 and not joined the allotted seat.

    b) Candidates admitted in Round 1 and avail free exit option after Round-2 result publication.

    c) Candidates who have been upgraded their Round-1 seat in Round-2 and not joined the upgraded seat."

[Emphasis supplied]

6. Mr. Khan contends that the 23 candidates in question were permitted to participate in the third/mop up round of counselling, despite the fact that they had been allotted seats in the first round but did not join the allotted seats. According to Mr. Khan, they were ineligible for participation in the third/mop up round by virtue of the answer to FAQ No. 45(a), extracted above.

7. Although the writ petition does not contain details of the 23 candidates to whom seats were so allotted, the example of one candidate was given by Mr. Khan at the first hearing of this petition on 12.03.2021. Referring to the allotment list published by the Union. after the first two rounds of counselling [Part of Annexure P-5 t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top