Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SHAKDHER, TALWANT SINGH
Kamlesh Singh Kushwaha – Appellant
Versus
Director (RL) – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Rajiv Shakdher, J.: (ORAL)
[PHYSICAL COURT HEARING]
CM APPL. 30653/2021
1. The substantive prayers made in the application are as follows: -
"a) allow the present application and grant early hearing to the aforesaid writ petition through Virtual/physical hearing;
b) direct the respondent to treat the petitioner at par with any other Chemical Assistants of batch 2008 and also send them for special "instrumental training" along with other Chemical Assistants;"
2. Mr. Bimlesh K. Singh, who appears for the applicant/petitioner, has, broadly, taken us through the backdrop, in which the writ petition came to be filed in this Court.
3. Accordingly, the prayer made for early hearing, is allowed.
3.1. Insofar as the other prayer is concerned, which is, that, the petitioner should be treated at par with his batchmates and sent for special `instrumental training', is an aspect qua which, observations are made hereinafter.
4. The application is, accordingly, disposed of.
W.P.(C) 3248/2019 & CM No. 14907/2021 [Application filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking stay on the operation of the impugned order, dated 22.02.2019]
5. With the consent of counsel for the parties, i.
Termination without proper notice or hearing violates principles of natural justice, necessitating reinstatement pending tribunal's final decision.
The court directed provisional participation in an interview while preserving the ability to contest eligibility, emphasizing that such permission does not confer rights pending further Tribunal acti....
Procedural irregularities in an adjudicatory process cannot be sustained, and the person(s) who hear an aggrieved party must decide and render reasons.
Provisional participation in interview pending fresh action before the Tribunal
The tribunal's decision was upheld based on the claim's staleness, allowing for a fresh representation on new grievances regarding equality in designation and remuneration.
Judicial authority must be respected; failure to comply with Tribunal orders results in administrative contempt and can have significant implications for the affected employee.
The Tribunal's dismissal of an application based solely on limitation, without addressing substantive legal claims, constitutes a reversible error warranting judicial intervention.
Undue delay in legal proceedings and failure to pursue remedies timely can preclude relief in matters concerning compassionate appointments.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
