IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Sanjeev Narula, J.
TTK Prestige Limited - Appellant
Versus
Baghla Sanitaryware Private Limited - Respondent
CS(COMM) 281 of 2021
Decided On : 04-06-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. exemption from filing attested affidavits (Para 1 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. liberty to file court fee later (Para 5 , 7) |
| 3. procedure for filing additional documents (Para 9 , 11) |
| 4. registration of plaint and summoning of defendants (Para 12 , 14) |
| 5. trademark infringement and passing off (Para 18 , 19 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 6. granting of interim injunction (Para 24 , 25) |
| 7. future court proceedings scheduled (Para 26 , 28) |
ORDER
[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]
I.A. No. 7379/2021 (for seeking exemption from filing attested affidavits)
1. The present application under Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short `CPC') on behalf of the Plaintiff seeks exemption from filing attested affidavits.
2. The Plaintiff submits that due to the current COVID-19 pandemic and resultant restrictions, they are unable to file the attested affidavits. Due to the urgency of the matter, Plaintiff has filed the subject suit without the attested affidavits.
3. The application is allowed, subject to the Plaintiff filing the exempted documents within two weeks from the day the lockdown restrictions imposed by the Government of NCT of Delhi are lifted and the facility for attestation of affidavits is resumed.
4. The application stands disposed of.
I.A. No. 7380/2021 (for seeking liberty for subsequent filing of relevant Court fee)
5. The present application under Section 149 r/w Section 151 of CPC on behalf of the Plaintiff seeks liberty for subsequent filing of relevant Court fee.
6. The Plaintiff submits that due to the current COVID-19 pandemic situation and resultant restrictions, they are unable to procure the necessary court fee stamps. Due to the urgency of matter, Plaintiff has filed the subject suit without the court fee.
7. The application is allowed, subject to the Plaintiff filing the subsequent Court fee within two weeks from the day the lockdown restrictions imposed by the Government of NCT of Delhi are lifted and the facility for issuance of court fee stamps is resumed.
8. The application stands disposed of.
I.A. No. 7378/2021 (under Order XI Rule 1(4) r/w Section 151 of CPC, 1908 to file additional documents and fair, translated and clear copy of the documents)
9. This is an application seeking leave to file additional documents and fair, translated and clear copy of the documents under the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015. (in short `Commercial Courts Act')
10. The Plaintiff, if they wish to file additional documents at a later stage, shall do so strictly as per the provisions of the Commercial Courts Act.
11. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.
CS(COMM) 281/2021
12. Let the plaint be registered as a suit.
13. Upon filing of process fee, issue summons to the Defendants by all permissible modes. Summons shall state that the written statement shall be filed by the Defendants within 30 days from the date of receipt of summons. Along with the written statement, the Defendants shall also file an affidavit of admission/denial of the documents of the Plaintiff, without which the written statement shall not be taken on record.
14. Liberty is given to the Plaintiff to file a replication within 15 days of the receipt of the written statement. Along with the replication, if any, filed by the Plaintiff, an affidavit of admission/denial of documents of the Defendants, be filed by the Plaintiff, without which the replication shall not be taken on record. If any of the parties wish to seek inspection of any documents, the same shall be sought and given within the timelines.
15. List before the Joint Registrar for marking of exhibits on 5th August, 2021. It is made clear that any party unjustifiably denying document(s) would be liable to be burdened with costs.
16. List before the Court for framing of issues on 09th September, 2021 thereafter.
I.A. No. 7377/2021 (under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 r/w Section 151 of CPC, 1908 for interim injunct










Plaintiff established a prima facie case of trademark infringement and copyright violation, leading to an injunction against Defendants' unauthorized use of trademarks.
Plaintiff established a prima facie case for trademark and copyright infringement, necessitating an interim injunction to prevent consumer confusion and irreparable harm.
Trademark infringement claims must prevent confusion in the marketplace, emphasizing the necessity for injunctions when identical marks are used in overlapping services, particularly in a global cont....
A plaintiff must demonstrate a prima facie case of trademark infringement, supported by evidence of prior use and likelihood of consumer confusion to obtain an ex-parte injunction.
Trademark infringement occurs when a mark is deceptively similar to a registered trademark, causing consumer confusion, which justifies injunctive relief.
The court upheld that protecting registered trademarks from potentially infringing use requires establishing a prima facie case, balance of convenience, and potential for irreparable harm.
The court granted an ad-interim injunction for trademark and copyright infringement upon finding a prima facie case of passing off by the defendants, who adopted a deceptively similar mark subsequent....
The court affirmed that trademark owners are entitled to an interim injunction against unauthorized similar use that may confuse consumers, prioritizing the prevention of irreparable harm over potent....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.