Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
VIBHU BAKHRU
Chief Engineer IV, Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Devlp. Corp. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Well Protect Manpower Services Pv – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. arbitration initiation and agreement details. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 2. summary of claims and defenses in arbitration. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 3. findings and awards of the arbitral tribunal. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. grounds for dsiidc's appeal against the award. (Para 24 , 25) |
| 5. court's evaluation of claims and award validity. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 6. dismissal of the petition. (Para 35) |
JUDGMENT
Vibhu Bakhru, J. The petitioner (hereinafter `DSIIDC') has filed the present petition under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter the `A&C Act') impugning an arbitral award (hereinafter the `impugned award') dated 11.12.2020 delivered by the Arbitral Tribunal consisting of Justice (retd.) Swatanter Kumar as the Sole Arbitrator (hereinafter the `Arbitral Tribunal').
2. The impugned award was rendered in the context of disputes that have arisen between the parties in connection with the Agreement dated 23.11.2016 (hereafter the `Agreement').
Factual Context
3. On 27.06.2016, DSIIDC issued a notice inviting tender for providing watch and ward services for various housi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
