IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Vibhu Bakhru, J.
Union of India, Ministry of Railways, Railway Board - Appellant
Versus
Jindal Rail Infrastructure Limited - Respondent
O.M.P. (COMM) 227 of 2019
Decided On : 23-05-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. disputes on wagon supply agreements. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 2. amendments and adjustments to agreements. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 3. arbitration initiation and claims presentation. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 4. tribunal's jurisdiction on claims. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 5. details of the impugned arbitral award. (Para 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 6. parties’ arguments on award validity. (Para 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 7. court's interpretation and ruling. (Para 41 , 42 , 66 , 68 , 76) |
JUDGMENT
Vibhu Bakhru, J. The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the `A&C Act') impugning the arbitral award dated 01.03.2019 (hereafter the `impugned award') rendered by the Arbitral Tribunal comprising of a Sole Arbitrator (hereafter the `Arbitral Tribunal').
2. The impugned award was rendered in the context of disputes that had arisen between the parties in connection with an agreement dated 12.06.2015 entered into between petitioner no.1 (hereafter `the Railways') and the respondent (hereafter `JRIL').
Factual Background
3. JRIL is, inter alia, engaged in the manufacture of Railway Rolling Stock for the Indian Railways.
4. On 13.01.2015, the Railways issued a `Bid Invitation and Schedule of Requirement' [E-Tender bearing no 2014/RS(I)/954/36 (TC)] followed by the Corrigendum dated 25.03.2015, inviting electronic bids, for the manufacture and supply of the following wagons:
| S.No. | Description | Quantity specified in Tender dated 13.01.2015 | Quantity specified in Corrigendum dated 25.03.2015 |
| 1 | BG Bogie Open Wagon Type `BOXNHL' | 4392 | 7492 |
| 2 | BG Bogie Covered Wagon Type `BCNHL' | 3706 | 606 |
| 3 | BG Bogie Open Wagon Type `BOSTHSM2' | 211 | 211 |
| 4 | BG Bogie Hopper Wagon Type `BOBYN 22.9' | 200 | 200 |
| Total | 8509 | 8509 |
5. Clause 2 of the Bid Invitation and Schedule of Requirement stipulated that the aforementioned quantity was tentative, and the Railways reserved its right, without assigning any reason, to either decrease the tender quantity or discharge the tender entirely or not order some of the wagon types indicated in the tender quantity.
6. Pursuant to the said invitation for tenders, JRIL submitted its bid and the same was opened on 20.04.2015. JRIL was accepted as the lowest bidder (L-1 bidder). On 02.06.2015, the Railways issued the Letter of Acceptance (hereafter `the LoA') communicating its decision to place an order on JRIL for supply of the following wagons at the price as quoted by JRIL:
| Wagon Type | Quantity | Basic Rate per wagon |
| BOXNHL | 1654 | Rs.10,80,000/- |
| BCNHL | 106 | Rs.10,71,000/- |
| BOSTHSM2 | 111 | Rs.8,91,000/- |
| TOTAL | 1871, |
In terms of the LoA, the orders for supply of wagons would be released in two tranches.
7. Thereafter, on 12.06.2015, the parties entered into the Contract bearing no. 2015/RS(I)/954/44/1777 (hereinafter the `Agreement'). In terms of the Agreement, the Railways issued an order for manufacture and supply of 1403 numbers of wagons for a total contract price of Rs.151,52,40,000/- without excise duty and VAT, as the first tranche. The order for the balance 468 numbers of wagons was withheld and required to be released in the second tranche.
8. In terms of the Optional Clause under the Agreement (Clause 2.4 renumbered as Clause 2.8 of the Agreement), the Railways reserved the right to increase/decrease the ordered quantity up to 30% of the ordered quantity during the currency of the Agreement, on the same price and terms and conditions, with a suitable extension in the delivery period for the optional quantity. Further, in terms of Clause 6 of the Agreement (the Delivery Schedule), the supplies had to be completed within a period of twelve months from the date of placement of the Agreement. The said Agreement was accepted by JRIL on 18.06.2015.
9. The Agreement was amended several times. On 31.07.2015, Amendment no. I to the Agreement was issued by the Railways. In terms of Amendment no. I, certain clauses were incorporated in the Agreement. Clause
The interpretation of contracts by arbitral tribunals cannot violate their explicit terms; arbitrators cannot alter agreements based on changes in market conditions.
The Court emphasized the importance of evidence in arbitration proceedings and upheld the validity of the arbitral award based on the evidence presented.
(1) Appeal against arbitral award – Arbitral award may not be interfered with if view taken by Arbitrator is a possible view based on facts – Court cannot undertake independent assessment of merits o....
The court upheld the arbitral award allowing refund of liquidated damages due to the interpretation of contract clauses, confirming limited grounds for interference under arbitration law.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of the Contract Agreement, CENVAT and VAT provisions, and the terms of price adjustment under the Agreement.
An Arbitral Tribunal must adhere to explicit contractual terms without imposing external fairness standards, as such actions may result in rewriting the contract, which is impermissible under arbitra....
The court upheld the validity of the waiver of objections regarding arbitrator eligibility and affirmed that it does not review arbitral awards on merits, focusing only on public policy and patent il....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.