Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Vibhu Bakhru, J.
Kanti Bijlee Utpadan Nigam Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Paltech Cooling Towers & Equipments Ltd. - Respondent
O.M.P. (COMM.) 154 of 2021 and IA Nos. 5562 of 2021, 5563 of 2021 & 5565 of 2021
Decided On : 05-07-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction and details of parties involved. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. overview of contracts between kbunl and pctel. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. delay and completion issues regarding the contracts. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. pctel's requests for payment and kbunl's responses. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. discussions on performance guarantee tests and financial burdens. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 6. litigation and arbitration sequence post contract disputes. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 7. claims filed by pctel and counterclaims by kbunl. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 8. assessment of the arbitral award by the tribunal. (Para 31 , 32 , 34) |
| 9. court's critique of the arbitral award process and findings. (Para 35 , 39 , 48 , 54) |
| 10. conclusion of the court's judgment on the appeal. (Para 56 , 57 , 58 , 59) |
JUDGMENT
Vibhu Bakhru, J. Kanti Bijlee Utpadan Nigam Ltd (hereafter `KBUNL') has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the `A&C Act') impugning an arbitral award dated 30.12.2020 (hereafter the `impugned award') delivered by an Arbitral Tribunal comprising of a Sole Arbitrator (hereafter the `Arbitral Tribunal').
2. KBUNL was earlier a Joint Venture of NTPC Ltd. and Bihar Electricity Board and is currently, a 100% wholly owned subsidiary of NTPC Ltd. KBUNL was incorporated for the operation and maintenance of Units no.1 and 2 as well as installation of Units no. 3 and 4 of the Muzaffarpur Thermal Power Station located at Kanti, Distt., Muzaffarpur, Bihar.
3. Paltech Cooling Towers & Equipments Ltd (hereafter `PCTEL') is, inter-alia, engaged in the business of manufacturing of cooling and chilling plants and has been registered as a small scale industry under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Act, 2006 (hereafter the `MSME Act').
4. On 26.06.2010, KBUNL had invited sealed bids being IFD No. CS-0350-135-2 for "induced draft cooling tower package for Muzaffarpur Thermal Power Project Stage-II".
5. PCTEL submitted its bid and was declared successful. Thereafter, the contract was awarded to PCTEL through two separate Notifications of Award dated 09.08.2011 bearing (i) Ref No. CS-0350-1352-2-FC-NOA-24 for Ex-Works supply valued at Rs.13,52,30,000/- (hereafter the `Supply Contract') and; (ii) Ref No. CS-0350-1352-2-FC-NOA-25 for providing all services to be supplied by PCTEL for complete induced draft cooling tower package for Muzaffarpur Thermal Power Project, Stage-II, valued at Rs.31,90,06,000/- (hereafter `the Service Contract').
6. The Supply Contract and the Service Contract (collectively referred to as `Contracts') were entered into between the parties on 10.09.2011. The work under the Contracts commenced from the date of Notification of Award, that is, 09.08.2011 and was to be completed within a period of 24 (twenty-four) months, that is, by 08.08.2013.
7. In terms of the Contracts entered into between the parties, KBUNL was required to retain 10% of the Contract Price until the Performance Guarantee Test (PGT) was conducted. In compliance with the said terms on 16.09.2011, PCTEL furnished two Performance Bank Guarantees, being Bank Guarantee No. 0407911BG0000141 for an amount of Rs.1,35,23,000/- in relation to the Supply Contract and, Bank Guarantee No. 0407911BG0000140 for an amount of Rs.3,19,00,600/- in relation to the Service Contract, issued by the State Bank of India in favour of KBUNL.
8. KBUNL claims that due to various reasons attributable to PCTEL, the works could not be completed within the stipulated time period, that is, by 08.08.2013 under both the Service Contract and Supply Contract. KBUNL further claims that seventeen time extensions were requested by PCTEL to facilitate completion of works which was granted without prejudice to KBUNL's right to levy liquidated damages in terms of the Contracts.
9. On 16.03.2016, PCTEL completed facilities Cooling Tower No. 3 (CT#3), Cooling Tower No. 4 (CT#4) and Control Room under Clause
AI
Arbitration awards must be clear and justified; arbitrary awards lacking detailed reasoning and analysis fail to meet legal standards.
A party must prove actual losses to validly invoke a Contract Performance Bank Guarantee and cannot use it as a penalty for non-performance.
The Arbitral Tribunal's decision to award refunds related to price reductions and bank charges was upheld, demonstrating the limited grounds for court interference under the Arbitration and Conciliat....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the decision of the arbitral Tribunal is entitled to substantial discretion in awarding interest, and the court does not sit as the first appe....
The court upheld the validity of the arbitration agreement while emphasizing the necessity of clear evidence for quantifying damages, ruling that claims for compound interest were not accounted for i....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the decision of the Arbitral Tribunal must be based on evidence and material on record, and the Court will not interfere with the award unless....
The court affirmed that deductions for non-performance are valid when based on contract conditions and substantiated by timely verification reports, emphasizing the importance of evidentiary reasonin....
The Arbitral Tribunal has considerable discretion in evaluating evidence and interpreting contract clauses, and its decision cannot be interfered with unless found to be patently illegal or in confli....
The arbitral tribunal's awards must be founded on evidence; awards lacking sufficient support can be overturned on appeal.
Arbitral tribunals have discretion over fact-finding, and courts should not re-evaluate evidence unless decisions violate public policy or involve patent illegality.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
