SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Saurabh Banerjee, JJ.
MDNV Rao, Ex CPL 790835-T - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 7101 of 2022 & CM Appl. 21781 of 2022
Decided On : 23-08-2022




Government employees are entitled to pro-rata pension under Rule 37 of Pension Rules, as reinforced by prior judicial decisions.

Headnote:(A) Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 - Rule 37; Writ of Mandamus - Pro-rata pension - Petitioner, discharged after 10 years of service, seeks grant of pro-rata pension relying on judgments dated 09.01.2019 and 23.02.2021 - Petition disposed directing consideration for eligibility. (Paras 1-6)

(B) Government employees - Entitlement - All Central Government employees are entitled to pro-rata pension as per Notification no. 28/30/2004-P & PW

(B) dated 26.05.2005. (Paras 3-4)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was enrolled in the Indian Air Force and discharged after rendering over 10 years of service. He claims entitlement to pro-rata pension based on applicable rules and previous judgments. (Paras 2-3)

Findings of Court:
The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner’s entitlement to pro-rata pension and release it if found eligible, along with appropriate interest. (Paras 6)

Issues: Whether the petitioner is entitled to pro-rata pension based on prior judgments and applicable rules. (Paras 1, 6)

Ratio Decidendi: The court recognized the entitlement of Central Government employees to pro-rata pension under Rule 37 of the Pension Rules and directed appropriate action based on prior judgments. (Paras 3-6)

Result: Petition disposed of with directions.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks pro-rata pension. (Para 1 , 2)
2. entitlement to pro-rata pension based on rules. (Para 3)
3. notice issued; consideration of eligibility. (Para 4 , 5)
4. case disposed with directions to consider eligibility. (Para 6 , 7)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus for directing the respondents to grant pro-rata pension in favour of the petitioner from the date of his discharge with all consequential benefits along with interest @14% in terms of judgment dated 09.01.2019 in W.P.(C) No. 10026/2016 and judgment dated 23.02.2021 in W.P.(C) No. 1925/2021.

2. According to petitioner, he was enrolled in Indian Air Force on 19.03.1997 and underwent required training successfully. Petitioner had appeared in the interview for selection to the post of Foreman (Chargeman-1) (Radio) Group `C' (Non-Gazetted) in Naval Dockyard, Vishakhapatnam after obtaining "No Objection Certificate" dated 04.07.2006 from respondents. The petitioner was offered to join the aforesaid post in the abovementioned dockyard in terms of the appointment letter dated 16.03.2007. The petitioner stood discharged from the services of IAF on 19.04.2007 after rendering regular service of 10 years, 01 month and 01 day and reserve service of 02 years.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by virtue of Notification no. 28/30/2004-P & PW (B) dated 26.05.2005 and in terms of Rule 37 of Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, all employees of Central Government are entitled to grant of pro-rata pension and that in view of judgment dated 09.01.2019 rendered in W.P.(C) No. 10026/2019, titled as Govind Kumar Srivastava Vs. Union of India & Ors., which has been upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, respondents be directed to grant pro-rata pension with arrears to the petitioner for his past services in Indian Air Force.

4. Notice issued.

5. Mr. Farman Ali, learned counsel for the respondents enters appearance and upon accepting notice submits that the case of petitioner shall be considered and his pro-rata pension shall be released, if found eligible.

6. Upon hearing, we dispose of the present petition with direction to respondents to consider the case of petitioner and release pro-rata pension, if found eligible, with appropriate interest in terms of judgment dated 09.01.2019 in W.P.(C) No. 10026/2019 and judgment dated 08.02.2021 in W.P (C) 9905/2019 passed by this Court.

7. With directions as aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of. Pending application is disposed of as infructuous.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top