SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Saurabh Banerjee, JJ.
Sandeep Kumar Sharma, Ex CPL-742410-N - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 14460 of 2022 & CM. Appl. 44120 of 2022
Decided On : 12-10-2022




A petitioner discharged from service may be entitled to pro-rata pension based on prior judgments, contingent on eligibility verification by the relevant authorities.

Headnote:(A) Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 - Grant of pro-rata pension - Writ of mandamus sought for pro-rata pension and consequential benefits from date of discharge - Petitioner having rendered more than 10 years of service - Directions issued to consider eligibility for pension in accordance with prior judgments. (Paras 1, 3, 6)

(B) Judgments referred - The petitioner relied on the judgment dated 09.01.2019 for entitlement to pro-rata pension which was upheld by the Supreme Court. (Paras 3, 6)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was enrolled in the Indian Air Force on 14.07.1997, discharged on 11.11.2007 after 10 years of service, and claimed pro-rata pension based on prior legal precedents.

Findings of Court:
The court directed that the respondents should consider the petitioner's claim and release pro-rata pension if eligible.

Issues: The main issue was the eligibility of the petitioner for pro-rata pension post-discharge based on length of service.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized on the necessity to consider the eligibility for pro-rata pension based on past rulings which support the petitioner's claim.

Result: Petition disposed of with directions.

Table of Content
1. eligibility for pro-rata pension under government rules (Para 1 , 3)
2. petitioner's service details and discharge reason (Para 2)
3. disposition of petition and pending application (Para 4 , 7)
4. court's directive on consideration of pro-rata pension (Para 5 , 6)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. The petitioner has filed the present petition seeking a writ of mandamus for directing the respondents to grant pro-rata pension in favour of the petitioner from the date of his discharge with all consequential benefits along with interest @14% in terms of judgment dated 09.01.2019 in W.P.(C) No. 10026/2016 and judgment dated 08.02.2021 in W.P.(C) No. 9905/2019.

2. According to petitioner, he was enrolled in Indian Air Force on 14.07.1997 and underwent required training successfully. Petitioner had appeared in the interview and got selected to the post of Life Insurance Corporation of India after obtaining "No Objection Certificate" from respondents but he could not retain the copy of it but the same can be verified/confirmed from the discharge certificate itself where the reason for discharge is mentioned as Civil Post. The petitioner was offered to join the above-said post of Apprentice Development Officer in LIC in terms of the appointment letter dated 19.11.2007. The petitioner stood discharged from the services of IAF on 11.11.2007 after rendering regular service of 10 years, 03 months and 27 days.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by virtue of Office Memorandum No.28/30/2004-P & PW (B) dated 26.07.2005 and in terms with Rule 37 of Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, all employees of Central Government are entitled to grant of pro-rata pension and that in view of judgment dated 09.01.2019 rendered in W.P.(C) No. 10026/2016, titled as Govind Kumar Srivastava Vs. Union of India & Ors., which has been upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, respondents be directed to grant pro-rata pension with arrears to the petitioner for their past services in Air Force.

4. Notice issued.

5. M. Abhishek Saket, learned counsel has entered appearance on behalf of respondents and submits that the case of petitioner shall be considered and his pro-rata pension shall be released, if he is found eligible.

6. Upon hearing, we dispose of the present petition with direction to respondents to consider the case of petitioner and release pro-rata pension, if found eligible, with appropriate interest in terms of judgment dated 09.01.2019 in W.P.(C) No. 10026/2016 and judgment dated 08.02.2021 in W.P (C) 9905/2019 passed by this Court.

7. With directions as aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of. Pending application is disposed of as infructuous.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top