IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Saurabh Banerjee, JJ.
Ex-Cpl Jyoti Ranjan Hota - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 15349 of 2022 & CM Appl. 47649 of 2022
Decided On : 09-11-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks mandamus for pro-rata pension. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments for entitlement of pro-rata pension under rules and previous judgments. (Para 3 , 5) |
| 3. petitioner qualifies for relief based on service duration. (Para 6) |
| 4. court directs consideration of pension eligibility. (Para 7) |
| 5. petition disposed with directions. (Para 8) |
1. The petitioner has filed the present petition seeking a writ of mandamus for directing the respondents to grant pro-rata pension in favour of the petitioner from the date of his discharge with all consequential benefits along with interest @14% in terms of judgment dated 09.01.2019 in W.P.(C) No. 10026/2016 and judgment dated 08.02.2021 in W.P.(C) No. 9905/2019.
2. According to petitioner, he was enrolled in Indian Air Force on 27.06.2006 and underwent required training successfully. On completion of 10 years, 06 months and 14 days of services, petitioner obtained pre-mature discharge through proper channel to join a civil post, i.e. Assistant Collector, under Government of Orissa. Initially, he was denied to be discharged from service by the respondents, however, learned AFT (PB), New Delhi vide its order dated 23.08.2016 in OA No.611/2016 directed to respondents to issue NOC in favour of the petitioner and to discharge him from Air Force to facilitate him in joining his new assignment by due date.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by virtue of Office Memorandum No. 28/30/2004-P & PW (B) dated 26.07.2005 and in terms with Rule 37 of Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, all employees of Central Government are entitled to grant of pro-rata pension and that in view of judgment dated 09.01.2019 rendered in W.P.(C) No. 10026/2016, titled as Govind Kumar Srivastava Vs. Union of India & Ors., which has been upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, respondents be directed to grant pro-rata pension with arrears to the petitioner for their past services in Air Force.
4. Notice issued.
5. Ms. Archana Surve, Govt. Pleader accepts notice on behalf of Union of India and submits that the case of petitioner shall be considered and his pro-rata pension shall be released, if found eligible.
6. Though, in the present case, the petitioner took voluntary retirement from Air Force, however, since the petitioner had already completed 10 years, 06 months 14 days of services, therefore, the relief(s) granted to the petitioner vide judgment dated 09.01.2019 passed in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) shall also be granted to the petitioner herein.
7. In view of above, we hereby direct the respondents to consider the case of petitioner and release pro-rata pension, if found eligible, with appropriate interest in terms of judgment dated 09.01.2019 in W.P.(C) No. 10026/2016 and judgment dated 08.02.2021 in W.P (C) 9905/2019 passed by this Court.
8. With directions as aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of. Pending application is disposed of as infructuous.
The court affirmed that an individual who completes over 10 years of service is entitled to pro-rata pension upon voluntary retirement, consistent with established judicial precedents.
Government employees are entitled to pro-rata pension under Rule 37 of Pension Rules, as reinforced by prior judicial decisions.
A petitioner discharged from service may be entitled to pro-rata pension based on prior judgments, contingent on eligibility verification by the relevant authorities.
Legal obligation to grant pro-rata pension exists under Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules for eligible employees, requiring authorities to act accordingly.
Entitlement to pro-rata pension for discharged military personnel based on prior judgments confirming such rights supports administrative compliance for eligibility.
Entitlement to pro-rata pension for past services in the Air Force based on relevant rules and previous judgments.
Eligibility for pro-rata pension is affirmed based on service duration and binding past judgments under pension rules.
Entitlement to pro-rata pension based on relevant rules and previous judgments.
Entitlement to pro-rata pension for government employees is upheld as per established rules and prior judgments, requiring appropriate action by the authorities.
Eligibility for pro-rata pension requires consideration of service duration and relevant notifications, affirming rights under previous judgments.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.