SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, SAURABH BANERJEE
Ex-Cpl Jyoti Ranjan Hota – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks mandamus for pro-rata pension. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments for entitlement of pro-rata pension under rules and previous judgments. (Para 3 , 5)
3. petitioner qualifies for relief based on service duration. (Para 6)
4. court directs consideration of pension eligibility. (Para 7)
5. petition disposed with directions. (Para 8)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. The petitioner has filed the present petition seeking a writ of mandamus for directing the respondents to grant pro-rata pension in favour of the petitioner from the date of his discharge with all consequential benefits along with interest @14% in terms of judgment dated 09.01.2019 in W.P.(C) No. 10026/2016 and judgment dated 08.02.2021 in W.P.(C) No. 9905/2019.

2. According to petitioner, he was enrolled in Indian Air Force on 27.06.2006 and underwent required training successfully. On completion of 10 years, 06 months and 14 days of services, petitioner obtained pre-mature discharge through proper channel to join a civil post, i.e. Assistant Collector, under Government of Orissa. Initially, he was denied to be discharged from service by the respondents, however, learned AFT (PB), New Delhi vide its order dat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top