SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Saurabh Banerjee, JJ.
Ex-Cpl Jyoti Ranjan Hota - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 15349 of 2022 & CM Appl. 47649 of 2022
Decided On : 09-11-2022




The court affirmed that an individual who completes over 10 years of service is entitled to pro-rata pension upon voluntary retirement, consistent with established judicial precedents.

Headnote:(A) Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 - Office Memorandum No. 28/30/2004-P & PW

(B) dated 26.07.2005 - Petition for pro-rata pension - The petitioner, having completed over 10 years of service in the Air Force, seeks pro-rata pension post voluntary retirement in accordance with previous judgments by this Court - Court directed respondents to consider granting pro-rata pension along with appropriate interest consistent with prior rulings. (Paras 1-7)

(B) Judicial precedent - A party that receives a favorable judgment in one case is entitled to similar treatment in subsequent, factually similar cases - The principle of equality before the law necessitates that the relief granted in prior rulings is applicable here as well. (Paras 3-5)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner enlisted in the Air Force on 27.06.2006 and served for 10 years, 6 months, and 14 days before receiving a discharge to transition to a civil position. He seeks a writ mandamus for granting pro-rata pension based on prior rulings.

Findings of Court:
The Court found that since the petitioner completed the necessary service, he is entitled to the same pension rights as established in previous decisions.

Issues: The key issues were the eligibility for pro-rata pension post voluntary retirement and the time frame for pension release.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the petitioner’s service duration qualifies him for pro-rata pension, consistent with prior decisions upholding this right for similarly situated personnel.

Result: Petition disposed of with directions.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks mandamus for pro-rata pension. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments for entitlement of pro-rata pension under rules and previous judgments. (Para 3 , 5)
3. petitioner qualifies for relief based on service duration. (Para 6)
4. court directs consideration of pension eligibility. (Para 7)
5. petition disposed with directions. (Para 8)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. The petitioner has filed the present petition seeking a writ of mandamus for directing the respondents to grant pro-rata pension in favour of the petitioner from the date of his discharge with all consequential benefits along with interest @14% in terms of judgment dated 09.01.2019 in W.P.(C) No. 10026/2016 and judgment dated 08.02.2021 in W.P.(C) No. 9905/2019.

2. According to petitioner, he was enrolled in Indian Air Force on 27.06.2006 and underwent required training successfully. On completion of 10 years, 06 months and 14 days of services, petitioner obtained pre-mature discharge through proper channel to join a civil post, i.e. Assistant Collector, under Government of Orissa. Initially, he was denied to be discharged from service by the respondents, however, learned AFT (PB), New Delhi vide its order dated 23.08.2016 in OA No.611/2016 directed to respondents to issue NOC in favour of the petitioner and to discharge him from Air Force to facilitate him in joining his new assignment by due date.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by virtue of Office Memorandum No. 28/30/2004-P & PW (B) dated 26.07.2005 and in terms with Rule 37 of Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, all employees of Central Government are entitled to grant of pro-rata pension and that in view of judgment dated 09.01.2019 rendered in W.P.(C) No. 10026/2016, titled as Govind Kumar Srivastava Vs. Union of India & Ors., which has been upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, respondents be directed to grant pro-rata pension with arrears to the petitioner for their past services in Air Force.

4. Notice issued.

5. Ms. Archana Surve, Govt. Pleader accepts notice on behalf of Union of India and submits that the case of petitioner shall be considered and his pro-rata pension shall be released, if found eligible.

6. Though, in the present case, the petitioner took voluntary retirement from Air Force, however, since the petitioner had already completed 10 years, 06 months 14 days of services, therefore, the relief(s) granted to the petitioner vide judgment dated 09.01.2019 passed in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) shall also be granted to the petitioner herein.

7. In view of above, we hereby direct the respondents to consider the case of petitioner and release pro-rata pension, if found eligible, with appropriate interest in terms of judgment dated 09.01.2019 in W.P.(C) No. 10026/2016 and judgment dated 08.02.2021 in W.P (C) 9905/2019 passed by this Court.

8. With directions as aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of. Pending application is disposed of as infructuous.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top