SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Saurabh Banerjee, JJ.
Inder Pal Singh, Ex CPL 648397 - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 16190 of 2022
Decided On : 24-11-2022




Eligibility for pro-rata pension is affirmed based on service duration and binding past judgments under pension rules.

Headnote:(A) Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 - Notification no. 28/30/2004-P & PW

(B) dated 26.05.2005 - Writ of mandamus sought for directing the grant of pro-rata pension to the petitioner who served in the Indian Air Force - The petitioner was eligible for pro-rata pension after serving for over ten years - The court acknowledged the precedent set in judgments dated 09.01.2019 and 08.02.2021 in granting such benefits. (Paras 3-5)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, discharged after nearly eleven years of service in the Indian Air Force, sought pro-rata pension based on his eligibility and prior court judgments.

Findings of Court:
The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner’s case for pro-rata pension if eligible, emphasizing adherence to previous binding judgments.

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner qualified for pro-rata pension under the relevant rules and past judgments.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reiterated that the petitioner was entitled to pension benefits based on service duration and relevant provisions from prior judgments.

Result: The petition is disposed of with directions to the respondents to grant pro-rata pension if eligible.

JUDGMENT

CM APPL. 50653/2022 (exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The application is accordingly disposed of.

W.P.(C) 16190/2022

3. The petitioner has filed the present petition seeking a writ of mandamus for directing the respondents to grant pro-rata pension in favour of the petitioner from the date of his discharge with all consequential benefits along with interest @14% in terms of judgment dated 09.01.2019 in W.P.(C) No. 10026/2016 and judgment dated 08.02.2021 in W.P.(C) No. 9905/2019.

4. According to petitioner, he was enrolled in Indian Air Force on 28.11.1977 and had undergone required training successfully. In terms of AFO No.1/1983 dated 22.01.1983 issued by the respondents vide which it was mentioned that Airmen irrespective of their terms of engagement are permitted to apply for Group `A' posts/services under Central/State Govt. and in Central/State Government Undertakings. Accordingly, petitioner sought permission and the same was allowed and he applied/selected as Class I Officer in Garden Reach Shipbuilders and Engineers Limited i.e. Government of India Undertaking after obtaining "No Objection Certificate" from respondents. The petitioner was offered to join the above-said post in Garden Reach Shipbuilders and Engineering Limited in terms of the appointment letter dated 20.04.1988. The petitioner stood discharged from the services of IAF on 14.06.1988 after rendering regular service of 10 years and 197 days of active service. The petitioner was also kept in reserve service for two years and he stood discharged on 30.06.1990.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by virtue of Notification no. 28/30/2004-P & PW (B) dated 26.05.2005 and in terms with Rule 37 of Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, all employees of Central Government are entitled to grant of pro-rata pension and that in view of judgment dated 09.01.2019 rendered in W.P.(C) No. 10026/2019, titled as Govind Kumar Srivastava Vs. Union of India & Ors., which has been upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, respondents be directed to grant pro-rata pension with arrears to the petitioner for their past services in Air Force.

6. Notice issued.

7. Mrs. Abha Malhotra, learned Senior Central Government Counsel has entered appearance on advance notice and submits that the case of petitioner shall be considered and his pro-rata pension shall be released, if found eligible.

8. Upon hearing, we dispose of the present petition with direction to respondents to consider the case of petitioner and release pro-rata pension, if found eligible, with appropriate interest in terms of judgment dated 09.01.2019 in W.P.(C) No. 10026/2019 and judgment dated 08.02.2021 in W.P (C) 9905/2019 passed by this Court.

9. With directions as aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of. Pending application is disposed of as infructuous.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top