Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, Tushar Rao Gedela, JJ.
Vishalakshi Nigam - Appellant
Versus
Lalit Kala Akademi - Respondent
W.P.(C) 13258 of 2022 & C.M. No. 40204 of 2022
Decided On : 13-09-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's request for expedited resolution. (Para 2) |
| 2. directive for tribunal's consideration. (Para 3) |
| 3. court's order on petition disposal. (Para 4 , 5) |
JUDGMENT
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral)--Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel appearing for the respondents.
2. Petitioner seeks a direction to the Board to decide the original application filed by the petitioner expeditiously in a time bound manner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of the petitioner though is of termination, however, the same is now tagged along with promotion and other miscellaneous matters and as such the hearing is not happening.
3. It is observed that the next date before the Tribunal is 06.10.2022. We direct the petitioner to mention before the Tribunal on the said date for an expeditious disposal of his petition. In case such a request is made the Tribunal shall sympathetically consider the same keeping in view the existing board position.
4. The petition is accordingly disposed of in the above terms.
5. Order dasti under the signature of the Court Master.
The right to a timely hearing is fundamental, especially in cases of termination, and courts should ensure expedited proceedings.
Courts should direct timely hearings to prevent delays from adversely affecting the rights of petitioners and operational efficiency of organizations.
The court emphasized the need for timely resolution in cases involving impending retirement to ensure the petitioner receives any potential benefits upon success.
Court directs expeditious disposal of revision petitions against refusal of teacher appointment approvals with hearing opportunity.
Court mandates expeditious resolution of pending tribunal applications to prevent undue delays affecting the petitioner's promotions.
The Court emphasized the importance of expediting administrative proceedings and maintaining interim protection during the decision-making process of recruitment disputes.
Authorities are mandated to timely address pending requests from petitioners, ensuring fairness in the decision-making process.
Court directs expeditious disposal of revision petition against notional service treatment with hearing opportunity.
The High Court may direct a statutory appellate authority to dispose of a pending appeal within a specified timeframe to ensure administrative justice and avoid undue delay to the aggrieved party.
The High Court has the jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus directing statutory authorities to dispose of pending revision petitions within a time-bound manner to ensure administrative accountabi....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
