SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Neeta Bhardwaj – Appellant
Versus
Kamlesh Sharma – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

CM APPL.42042/2022 (for exemption)

2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM APPL.42042/2022 is disposed of.

CM APPL.42041/2022 (for modification)

3. Vide previous order dated 9th September, 2022, this Court had noted the progress of the redevelopment of the Kalkaji Mandir and passed comprehensive directions, with the inputs of all stakeholders. Considering that the construction of all temporary shops had been completed, the Court had further directed that the same may be allotted, so that no temporary table arrangements would be required for the upcoming Navratas. It had also directed that status quo as to the entry and exit routes to the Mandir shall continue, as there were differing contentions by the parties in this regard.

4. Today, CM APPL.42041/2022 has been filed on behalf of ten shopkeepers, seeking permission to install temporary tables in the Kalkaji Mandir premises during the Navratra period, since allotment of temporary shops would take time.

5. A short report dated 22nd September, 2022 (hereinafter "Short Report") has also been filed by the ld. Administrator, which rais

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top