IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, JJ.
KRBL Limited - Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax - Respondent
W.P.(C) 14767 of 2022
Decided On : 19-10-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. entitlement to tax refund and interest. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. notice of appeal against itat order. (Para 4) |
| 3. timely appeal effect order requirement. (Para 5) |
| 4. court's directive on refund issuance. (Para 6 , 7) |
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J.:
C.M.No.45401/2022
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) No.14767/2022
1. Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the Respondents to issue refund of Rs.24,03,89,270/-along with up-to-date interest to the Petitioner pursuant to appeal effect order dated 05th April, 2021 arising out of order of CIT(A) as well as pass appeal effect order pursuant to order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (`ITAT') dated 09th May, 2022 and issue additional refund of Rs.9,96,10,730/-along with up-todate interest.
2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the ITAT deleted all the additions and ruled in favour of the Petitioner and the Petitioner is now entitled to a refund of the entire tax paid under protest aggregating to Rs.34,00,00,000/-(along with applicable interest under Section 244A/244A(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (`the Act').
3. He states that the Petitioner made several representations to the Respondents but to no avail. He submits that non-issuance of refund is in violation of Article 265 of the Constitution of India and also against Section 237 of the Act.
4. Issue notice. Mr.A.Renganath, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the Respondents-Revenue. He states that the Revenue is in the process of filing an appeal against the order of the ITAT.
5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the view that the Respondents-Revenue have had sufficient time to file an appeal against the order of the ITAT. In any event, in accordance with the mandate of law, the appeal effect order has to be passed within three months of passing of the appeal order.
6. Keeping in view the limited relief sought in the present writ petition, the same is disposed of along with pending application with a direction to the Respondents-revenue to consider:
(i) Issue of refund of Rs.24,03,89,270/-along with up-to-date interest to the Petitioner pursuant to appeal effect order dated 05th April, 2021 arising out of order of CIT(A); and
(ii) Appeal effect order pursuant to order of the ITAT dated 09th May, 2022 and issue additional refund of Rs. 9,96,10,730/-along with up- to-date interest, in accordance with law.
7. The necessary appeal effect orders and payments of refunds shall be made within the said period of six weeks. The rights and contentions of all the parties are left open.
The court held that the Revenue must issue a tax refund following favorable ITAT rulings, emphasizing performance within statutory timelines to comply with legal obligations.
Tax authorities are mandated to process refunds and pass appeal effect orders within specified timelines, with delays constituting a violation of constitutional rights.
Tax authorities must issue refunds due based on favorable ITAT orders within statutory deadlines, ensuring adherence to constitutional mandates regarding the issuance of refunds.
The Court mandated the issuance of tax refunds and appeal effect orders according to the ITAT ruling, emphasizing the importance of timely compliance within stipulated periods.
Timely compliance with statutory refund orders is imperative to protect taxpayer rights under the Income Tax Act and the Constitution.
Tax authorities are obligated to comply with statutory requirements regarding tax refunds, and failure to do so may contravene constitutional provisions.
Tax authorities are required to process refunds promptly as per binding orders from appellate authorities, emphasizing the significance of timely compliance with tax regulations.
The court affirmed the Respondents' obligation to act promptly on ITAT orders regarding refunds and applicable interest under the Income Tax Act.
The court emphasized that refunds under the Income Tax Act must be processed within specified timelines, and any lack of proper credit must not hinder the petitioner's entitlement to refunds.
Timely issuance of refunds as per the Income Tax Act is mandatory to prevent financial prejudice to the taxpayer, emphasizing the obligation of tax authorities to comply with tribunal orders.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.