SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
KRBL Limited – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax – Respondent


Table of Content
1. entitlement to tax refund and interest. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. notice of appeal against itat order. (Para 4)
3. timely appeal effect order requirement. (Para 5)
4. court's directive on refund issuance. (Para 6 , 7)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J.:

C.M.No.45401/2022

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) No.14767/2022

1. Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the Respondents to issue refund of Rs.24,03,89,270/-along with up-to-date interest to the Petitioner pursuant to appeal effect order dated 05th April, 2021 arising out of order of CIT(A) as well as pass appeal effect order pursuant to order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (`ITAT') dated 09th May, 2022 and issue additional refund of Rs.9,96,10,730/-along with up-todate interest.

2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the ITAT deleted all the additions and ruled in favour of the Petitioner and the Petitioner is now entitled to a refund of the entire tax paid under protest aggregating to Rs.34,00,00,000/-(along with applicable interest under Section 244A/244A(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (`the Act').

3. He states th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top