SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Amritpal @ Mannu - Appellant
Versus
State - Respondent
Crl.A. 174 of 2019
Decided On : 09-12-2022




The court can suspend a sentence if the appellant has served a significant portion and the appeal may take time, provided certain conditions are met.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 389 - POCSO Act - Sections 5 and 6 - Application for suspension of sentence pending appeal - Appellant has served 7 years and 8 months; remaining term is 1 year and 4 months - Court allows suspension of sentence on furnishing personal bond. (Paras 1-4)

(B) Conditions for suspension - Appellant must remain reachable on mobile, inform contact changes, and appear in Court when summoned. (Paras 4)

Facts of the case:
Application filed for suspension of sentence of the appellant convicted under FIR No. 511/2017 for serious offenses.

Findings of Court:
The court considered the totality of circumstances, including time served.

Issues: The key issue was whether to suspend the appellant's sentence pending appeal.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the appellant's time served and the consideration of ongoing appeal delays.

Result: Application allowed on conditions.

Table of Content
1. suspension of sentence application details. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. conditions for suspension of sentence. (Para 4)
3. disposal and listing of the appeal. (Para 5 , 6)

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)

CRL.M.(BAIL) 497/2022 (suspension of sentence)

1. The present application has been filed under Section 389 Cr. PC on behalf of the appellant seeking suspension of sentence in FIR No. 511/2017 lodged at PS Nihal Vihar under Sections 376/IPC 5/6 POCSO Act.

2. Earlier, application for suspension of sentence bearing CRL. M. (Bail) 306/2019 in which notice was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 15th February, 2019.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the last nominal roll, the appellant has already undergone custody of 7 years and 8 months and three days. The unexpired portion of sentence is only 1 years and four months. The nominal roll was filed on 10th May, 2022. Practically, now there is around 9 months of unexpired portion of the left sentence. The appeal still may take some time for consideration.

4. Taking into account the totality of facts and circumstances and the fact that the hearing of the appeal may take some time, the sentence of the appellant is suspended subject to furnishing of personal bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, subject to the following conditions:

(i) The appellant shall remain available on mobile number i.e. 9717571188, which he undertakes to keep operational during the pendency of the present appeal.

(ii) The appellant shall further remain in touch telephonically with SI Ramesh /Duty officer, P.S. Nihal Vihar, Delhi on mobile number i.e. 8700041995 on the first Monday of every month.

(iii) In the event of change of his residential address/contact details, the appellant shall promptly inform the same to the I.O./SHO, P.S. Nihal Vihar, Delhi.

(iv) The appellant shall remain present in the Court as and when appeal is taken up for hearing.

5. The present application is disposed of accordingly.

CRL.A. 174/2019

6. List this appeal in due course in the category of `Regulars' as per the year of its seniority.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top