Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Amritpal @ Mannu – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. suspension of sentence application details. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. conditions for suspension of sentence. (Para 4) |
| 3. disposal and listing of the appeal. (Para 5 , 6) |
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)
CRL.M.(BAIL) 497/2022 (suspension of sentence)
1. The present application has been filed under Section 389 Cr. PC on behalf of the appellant seeking suspension of sentence in FIR No. 511/2017 lodged at PS Nihal Vihar under Sections 376/IPC 5/6 POCSO Act.
2. Earlier, application for suspension of sentence bearing CRL. M. (Bail) 306/2019 in which notice was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 15th February, 2019.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the last nominal roll, the appellant has already undergone custody of 7 years and 8 months and three days. The unexpired portion of sentence is only 1 years and four months. The nominal roll was filed on 10th May, 2022. Practically, now there is around 9 months of unexpired portion of the left sentence. The appeal still may take some time for consideration.
4. Taking into account the totality of facts and circumstances and the fact that the hearing of the appeal may take some time, the sen
The court can suspend a sentence if the appellant has served a significant portion and the appeal may take time, provided certain conditions are met.
The court granted suspension of sentence pending appeal under specific conditions, emphasizing the need for the Appellant to remain reachable.
Suspension of sentence can be granted based on circumstances and previous similar orders for co-convicts, with conditions to ensure compliance.
The court may allow the suspension of sentences if the grounds raised by the appellant for suspension are arguable and the disposal of the appeal would consume time.
The court established that under Section 389 CrPC, the suspension of sentences is warranted in cases of significant delays in appeal hearings to uphold the rights of the accused and prevent injustice....
The court has the discretion to suspend sentences under Section 389 CrPC to prevent the frustration of the purpose of filing the appeal.
The court has the discretion to suspend sentences under Section 389 Cr.P.C. pending the appeal, based on the entirety of facts and circumstances.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
