Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
C.HARI SHANKAR, OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
Aadya Antya – Appellant
Versus
High Court Of Delhi Through Registrar General – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks appointment for a vacancy after another candidate's resignation. (Para 1 , 2) |
JUDGMENT :
OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J.
1. The petitioner has sought to invoke the extraordinary jurisdiction of this court to seek her appointment on the seat, which has fallen vacant after resignation of an appointee of the Delhi Judicial Services Examination, 2022, in accordance with Rule 18 (vii) of Delhi Judicial Services Rules, 1970.
2. The facts of the case would lie in a narrow compass, in as much as it is noted from the petition that the respondent had invited applications for filling up 123 vacancies in Delhi Judicial Services, vide Notification dated 24.02.2022 by conducting the Delhi Judicial Services Examination, 2022.
3. The petitioner applied for the aforesaid DJS Examination, 2022 and after successfully qualifying the preliminary and mains examination, appeared for the interview. Upon declaration of the final results on 24.03.2023, the petitioner secured the 93rd rank. The selection committee prepared a list of 301 candidates in order of merit, which included the names of the recommended and waitlisted candidates. Out of the said total list, 110 candidates were sele
Vacancies created by resignation after appointment must be filled via fresh recruitment, not from a waitlist.
(1) Appointments cannot be made over and above clear and anticipated vacancies which have been advertised even though Public Service Commission may have prepared a longer merit list than it was requi....
The petitioner's claim for appointment on the post of JLO from the reserved waiting list was found to be valid as he approached the Court before the expiry of the wait list, and the Court allowed the....
Rule 7 of the Kerala Judicial Service Rules permits appointments from the merit list approved by the Governor for one year, covering existing and anticipated vacancies, aligning with Supreme Court gu....
The waiting list for recruitment cannot be used to fill vacancies arising from the resignation of selected candidates, as such vacancies are treated as fresh vacancies requiring a new selection proce....
Eligibility for judicial service requires continuous practice as an advocate post-application, per Supreme Court's rulings. Selection processes must adhere to stated rules and applicable reservations....
Point of Law : Recruitment over and above notified vacancies is not in accordance with constitutional mandate of equal opportunity of unemployment, envisaged in Articles 14 and 16 of Constitution of ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
