SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Del) 782

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SAMIR SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STERRE SHARMA & ANR. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. entitlement of legal heirs to estate. (Para 2 , 5 , 8 , 23)
2. necessity of preserving estate pending litigation. (Para 3 , 4 , 6 , 7 , 9)
3. legal implications of prior probate applications. (Para 10 , 18 , 21 , 28 , 34)
4. arguments regarding maintainability of the suit. (Para 11 , 12 , 30 , 31)
5. distinction between probate and partition proceedings. (Para 14 , 22 , 26 , 29)
6. finding of prima facie case and balance of convenience. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39)
7. grant of interim relief to plaintiff. (Para 40 , 41)

JUDGMENT :

VIKAS MAHAJAN, J.

I.A. 37440/2024 (filed by plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 read with Section 151 CPC for grant of ad-interim ex-parte injunction)

1. With the consent of the parties the present application is taken up for disposal.

2. The present suit has been filed seeking partition, rendition of accounts and injunction of the estate left behind by late Capt. Satish Sharma. The plaintiff is the son whereas the defendant nos.1 & 2 are wife and daughter of late Capt. Satish Sharma.

3. Along with the present suit, plaintiff has also filed the present application for ad interim ex-parte injunction praying for restricting the defendants from creatin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top