TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI
R. Subbiah, President and R. Venkatesaperumal, Member
Union of India, Rep. by
the General Manager – Appellant
versus
S.C. Mariappan – Respondent
F.A. No.312 of 2014
Decided on 28.4.2022
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – S.15 – [Consumer Protection Act, 2019 – S.41] – Railway Act, 1989 – S.126(c), Railway Claims Tribunal - Services – Railways – Matters of Accident – Bar upon Consumer Forum to adjudicate the case - Appeal Against order of District Commission – Matters falling under the category of accidents/untoward incident connected to railways and of claims arising from service deficiencies, in view of Section 13 (1A) of the RCT Act read with the clause of bar under Section 15 thereof, by ousting jurisdiction of all courts, exclusive jurisdiction is conferred only upon the RCT to decide the claims over accidents/untoward incidents and other instances as specified in Section 123(c) of the Railway Act, Consumer Forum cannot entertain any such case.
Thus, that adjudication upon the issue of untoward incident falls only under the jurisdiction of the RTC, hold that the said part of the findings cannot be sustained. [Para 12]
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – S.15[Consumer Protection Act, 2019 – S.41] – Railway Act, 1989 – S.126(c), Railway Claims Tribunal - Services – Railways – matters arising from service deficiencies and negligence – Can be adjudicated by Consumer Forum – Thus, in view of the wide coverage given for the term ‘service’ in Section 2(1)(o) of the Act that includes transport sector/Railways also, undoubtedly, the consumer forum can very well have jurisdiction to try such cases – Also, in the present case, since the Railways have committed negligence-cum-deficiency in service, by all along keeping the written complaint/representation pending/un-replied and they have also indulged in suppression of material records connected to the enquiry conducted against the TTE and its outcome, to do substantial justice, it is just and proper to assess the compensation aspect by weighing it in between the 100% life-long disability sustained by the complainant and the gross negligence-cum-service deficiency/suppression of material records on the part of the Railways as well as the long lapse of time that would naturally prevent the complainant from pursuing any other effective remedy – On facts, total compensation of Rs.10,60,000/- as arrived at by the District Forum seems to be on the fair side and it also meets the ends of justice, hence, the said direction issued by the District Forum shall have to be confirmed – Appeal dismissed. [Paras 12, 13]
Result: Appeal dismissed.
ORDER
R. Subbiah, President.—This Appeal has been filed as against the Order, dated 07.04.2014, passed by the DCDRF, Chennai-North, in C.C. No.141 of 2013, whereby, the complaint filed by the respondent herein came to be allowed by directing the OP/appellant herein to pay him a total compensation of Rs.10.60 Lakh with interest @ 9% p.a. from 31.01.2001 till the date of payment, besides costs of Rs.10,000/-.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties shall be referred to in the course of this order, as per their respective rankings before the District Forum.
In brief, the case of the complainant, as given in the complaint filed before the District Forum, is as follows:—
The complainant, a Diploma Holder in EEE (Electrical and Electronics Engineering), was employed with M/s.Consul Consolidated (P) Ltd. at Secundarabad, Andhra Pradesh (A.P.), drawing a carry-home salary as nearly as Rs.10,000/- per month. In January, 1998, after spending the Pongal Holidays at his native place/Rajapalayam, for returning to the work place at A.P., he embarked upon a two-staged journey viz., first stage – from Rajapalayam to Madras and the second stage – from Madras to Secundarabad. On the date of journey/19.01.1998, due to non-availability of reserved tickets as it was a festival season then, he purchased a 2nd class unreserved ticket bearing No.00295 by paying Rs.200/-. One of his relatives by name Mr.Muthukrishnan also accompanied him in the travel by holding ticket No.26265. Both of them boarded Train No.6120/Nellai Express at Rajapalayam, by also carrying a brand new Suzuki Samurai Bike in the same train for his personal use at Secunderabad. As there was a heavy crowd in the unreserved compartment, the complainant and his relative detrained at Sivakasi and enquired the Travelling Ticket Examiner (TTE) Mr.Haridoss about availability of any berth in the reserved coach, for which, the TTE, at the outset, consented to verify without denying existence of such a chance. At that time, since the train was signalled to proceed ahead, the TTE rushed to Coach No.S-10 and the complainant & his relative followed him to know the availability and, even at that stage, the TTE did not prevent them from accompanying him into the said Coach. While so, the TTE, who seemed to be considerate until a little bit earlier, fumingly asked them to detrain at once without even mindful of the fact that the train was moving then at a brisk speed. The complainant pleaded with the TTE to let them travel in the said coach till the arrival of the next station at least, by expressing his willingness to be fined for the same, but, the TTE was determined to see them out of the said coach. While both of them were explaining him the difficulties in getting down from the train that was speeding up considerably, the enraged TTE, fiercely pushed off the complainant to fall on his relative-Muthukrishnan, who, in turn, fell on the platform and became unconscious after suffering severe head injury on the rear side with profuse bleeding. The complainant, who caught hold of the handle at the side entrance of the compartment and was dangling riskily, yelled out for help, but, the TTE unmindful of the predicament of the complainant as well as the alarmed outcries of the appalled commuters in the compartment, slammed and bolted the door, as a result, he lost the grip and was dragged in between the station platform and the running train, resulting in his left hand, left leg above knee and the right foot crushed off by the wheels of the train, leaving the complainant unconsciously drenched in a pool of blood. The abnormally rash and nefariously negligent act of the said TTE left the life and limbs of the complainant damaged and un-rectifiable forever. At the outset, he was treated at the Railway Hospital, where he was given only the first aid, and thereafter, he along with Muthukrishnan was transferred to Madurai Rajaji Government Hospital. He had to visit scores of private hospitals including
SupremeToday
1. Accidents/untoward incidents - claims over accidents/untoward incidents and other instances as specified in Section 123(c) of the Railway Act, Consumer Forum cannot entertain any such case.2. Rail....
Consumer Protection Act supplements & not supplants jurisdiction of Civil Courts or other statutory authorities.
(1) Railway Administration bears responsibility under Railways Act as well as Consumer Protection Act to ensure safety of passengers and their belongings during transit.(2) When theft occurs on a run....
(1) Railways – Railways will be responsible for the theft or loss of the luggage carried by passengers in the reserved Coach if it is established that such loss or theft occurred due to negligence or....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.