SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

KUMKUM RANI, B. S. MANRAL
National Insurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Shiv Charan – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Sh. Rajeev Kakkar, Advocate
For the Respondent:Sh. J.K. Jain and Sh. Vaibhav Jain, Advocates

ORDER

Kumkum Rani, Judicial Member II—This appeal has been directed against the judgment and order dated 21.07.2014 passed by the learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Haridwar (hereinafter to be referred as the District Commission) in consumer complaint No. 81 of 2014 styled as Sh. Shiv Charan Vs. National Insurance Co. and Another, whereby and wherein the learned District Commission has allowed the complaint.

2. The facts giving rise to the present appeal, in brief, are as such that the complainant – respondent (in short “complainant”) has filed the complaint before the District Commission to claim a compensation of Rs. 4,30,000/- on account of damages of vehicle in question “Tata Indigo No. UK08-TA-2763” alongwith Rs. 250/- per day towards rent for parking charges, Rs. 4,000/- as towing charges and Rs. 500/- per day as loss of income and Rs. 10,000/- as costs of litigation alongwith Rs. 2,00,000/- for mental harassment, i.e. a total sum of Rs. 9,00,000/-. In the complaint, it was averred that vehicle in question was insured with the opposite party – appellant (

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top