Back
MEENA RAMANATHAN, K. RANGA RAO
Branch Manager, Andhra Bank – Appellant
Versus
Paramkusham VM Pradeep – Respondent
ORDER
K. Ranga Rao, Member-Judicial—This Revision Petition is filed by the Petitioner/Opposite Party No.1, under section 47 (1) of Consumer Protection Act, 2019, with a prayer to set aside the Docket Order dated 19.12.2022 passed in CC No.152/2022 by the District Commission, Karimnagar and permit the Revision Petitioner/OP No.1 to file his written version and documents and to contest the Consumer Complaint and to pass orders in favour of the petitioner and against the Respondent No.1/Complainant.
2. The following few facts will help to know the background of filing the present Revision Petition by the petitioner/opposite party No.1.
3. The Respondent No.1/complainant filed Consumer Complaint vide C.C.No.152/2022 on the file of the District Consumer Commission, Karimnagar, praying the District Commission “to direct the opposite parties (a) To pay Rs.2,50,000/- towards the insurance amount covered under the Pradhan Manthri Surakash Bima Yojana with interest @ 18% per annum; (b) To pay Rs.2,50,000/- towards Atal Pension Scheme and (c) to pay Rs.25,000/- towards compensation for mental agony caused to the complainant and (d) to pay Rs.5,000/- towards costs of proceedings”.
4. As seen fr
(1) 45 days – as per the settled law and the Provision of law under Section 38(3) (a), the Statutory period of 45 days for filing written version starts from the said date.(2) Initial Period – 38(3) ....
Mandatory timelines under the Consumer Protection Act for filing responses are rigid, and courts cannot extend them beyond stipulated periods.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
