SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

J. RAJENDRA
Subhash Chandra Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Life Insurance Corporation of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Achal Singh Bule, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. Anoop K. Kaushal, Advocate
.

ORDER

This Revision Petition No.19 of 2023 challenges the order of the Rajasthan State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Circuit Bench at Udaipur (‘the State Commission’) dated 29.09.2022. Vide this order, the State Commission dismissed Appeal No.140/2017 and affirmed the order of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Chittorgarh (‘the District Forum’) dated 20.06.2017.

2. For convenience, the parties are referred to as placed in the original Complaint filed before the District Forum.

3. Brief facts of the case, as per the Petitioners/Complainants, are that the petitioners, residents of Begun, purchased two insurance policies, “Jeevan Aarogya-903”, for their son Tushar Jangid from the OPs. The first policy No.10583072 was issued on 06.08.2011 and the second policy No.108116681 was issued on 28.11.2011. They fully disclosed their son’s health condition to OP agents, including a Medical Imaging Report (MIR) dated 01.05.2007, which indicated that their son had a condition related to his left testis. The agents informed them that the policy would cover any medical expenses related to this condition, including an operation called “unilateral-orchiectomy,” listed in the p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top