SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SUDIP AHLUWALIA
Life Insurance Corporation of India – Appellant
Versus
Reena Agarwal – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Lakshay Sawhney, Advocate through V.C.
For the Respondent: Nemo

ORDER

This Revision Petition has been filed against the impugned Order dated 03.02.2020 passed by the Ld. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Delhi in First Appeal No. 284/2017 vide which, the Appeal filed by the Petitioner was dismissed, and the Order of the Ld. District Forum was affirmed.

2. The factual background, in brief, is that the Complainant’s husband took two life insurance Policies from the Petitioner/Opposite Party to ensure financial provision for the marriage of his daughters, appointing them as his nominees under the Policies. At the time of canvassing for the Insurance Policies, whatever questions were asked by the Agent were fully and correctly answered by the Complainant’s husband, which were noted by the Agents on a blank paper. However, the Agent insisted on signing the blank Proposal Forms for the Policies, stating that due to the year-end rush period, he could not complete everything on the spot andwould fill in the Forms later based on the provided information.

Subsequently, a full medical examination was conducted on the Complainant’s husband by a Senior Medical Examiner of the Opposite Party at his Clinic, and only on the basis of this report, th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top