Mondelez India Foods Private Limited VS Kumaraswamy M. R.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

AVM J. RAJENDRA
Mondelez India Foods Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Kumaraswamy M. R. – Respondent

Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Anil Tiwari (Through VC) and Mr. Prenshu, Advocates (Through VC)
For the Respondent No.1:Ms. Anubha Aggarwal, Advocate
For the Respondent No.2: None Appeared

ORDER

The present Revision Petition has been filed under Section 58(1)(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (the “Act”) against impugned order dated 13.07.2021, passed by the Karnataka State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bengaluru (the ‘State Commission’) in Appeal No. 505/2021, whereby the State Commission dismissed the Appeal and affirmed the Order dated 24.03.2021, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Mysore (the “District Commission”) in Consumer Complaint No. 21/2020.

2. For convenience, the parties are referred to as placed in the original Complaint filed before the District Commission. Mondelez India Foods Private Limited is identified as the Opposite Party No.1 (Petitioner herein). Kumar Swamy is identified as the Complainant (Respondent No.1 herein) and Brindavan General Store is identified as the Opposite Party No.2 (Respondent No.2 herein).

3. The facts of the case, as per the Complainant, are that on 10.01.2020, he purchased provisions, including four Cadbury Dairy Milk Crackle Chocolates, from OP- for a total of Rs.439, with each chocolate costing Rs.160. The transaction was documented vide Receipt No. 22283. Upon examining the ch