Back
GAUTAM CHOURDIYA, PRAMOD KUMAR VARMA
Managing Director, T. R. N. Energy Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Antim Rai – Respondent
ORDER
Gautam Chourdiya, President.—This appeal is filed against order dated 31.01.2024 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Korba (hereinafter called “District Commission” for short) in Complaint Case No.CC/2023/82 (No.RBT/CC/23/82 as mentioned in the impugned order) whereby the complaint was allowed and the opposite party / appellant herein was directed to pay the complainant / respondent balance amount of Rs.17,75,691/- (Seventeen Lacs Seventy Five Thousand Six Hundred Ninety One), compensation for mental and financial loss Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) and cost of litigation Rs.5,000/- (Five Thousand). All the above amounts were directed to be paid within 45 days failing which interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of order till realization was also directed to be paid. Aggrieved the opposite party has challenged the impugned order by way of this appeal.
2. In nutshell the facts of the case are that the complainant/ respondent is involved in providing services like concreting, painting, false ceiling, tiles fitting, sheet fitting and aluminum door and windows fittings etc. As per case of the complainant/ respondent she obtained work orders of above works from the op
Money recovery dispute – Consumer complaint not maintainable – Remedy is to file civil suit.
(1) Livelihood – It was the bounden duty of the opposite parties to establish that the purpose was not for the livelihood of the complainant. (2) Profit generation – It has to be seen whether the dom....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
