SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BINOY KUMAR
Manager, Tata AIG General Insurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Rangaswamy – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Mukul Kulhari, Advocate (VC)
For the Respondent:Mr. G.L.N. Murthy, Advocate Amicus Curiae

ORDER

Aggrieved by the concurrent findings and Orders passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Hassan (hereinafter referred to as the District Forum) and the Karnataka State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bangalore (hereinafter referred to as the State Commission), the Petitioner/ Insurance Company - Manager, TATA AIG General Insurance filed this Revision Petition No. 3450 of 2018 under Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short, the Act) against Mr. Rangaswamy (hereinafter referred to as the Respondent/ Complainant). The Complaint filed by the Complainant being Consumer Complaint No. 59 of 2014 before the District Forum was partly allowed. The relevant portion of the Order dated 30.10.2015 is reproduced as under: -

“Point No.1: On perusal of the pleadings, affidavits and exhibits marked in this case, it is undispute that the goods vehicle bearing No. KA-13-4902 was insured with the OP, the said vehicle was met with an accident on 30/31.08.2012 and was extensively damaged, that on the date of accident the policy was valid, the intimation of the accident was given to OPs, the OPs have registered the claim and surveyed the said accident thr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top