SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BIMLA KUMARI
Manju Saxena – Appellant
Versus
Samiah International Builders Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainants:Mr. M.K. Singh, Advocate
For the Opp. Party:Mr. Asghar Khan, Advocate

JUDGMENT

The Complainants, initially filed the complaint no. 211/2018 before the District Consumer Forum (South West District). Later on, the complaint was transferred to this Commission by Ld District Forum vide order dated 12.07.2018 for want of pecuniary jurisdiction. Thereafter, the present complaint was filed before this Commission on 21.07.2018.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the Complainants who are husband and wife had jointly booked two BHK flat in the Group Housing project of the Opposite Party, namely, ‘Garden City’ at Hapur, Uttar Pradesh. They paid an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- to the Opposite Party vide cheque bearing no. 375333 dated 15.02.2009 drawn on UCO Bank, towards the booking amount. Thereafter, the Opposite Party vide Allotment Letter dated 22.05.2010 allotted flat no. B7-306, third floor, admeasuring 1050 sq. ft. in the said project, to the Complainants. As per Allotment Letter, the basic sale price of the flat was Rs.16,70,000/-

3. It is the case of the Complainants that a written agreement (Annexure-A3) was executed between them and the Opposite Party, according to which, the Opposite Party had agreed to handover the possession of flat within 24 months f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top