Karan Aggarwal VS M3M India Limited.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, BIMLA KUMARI
Karan Aggarwal – Appellant
Versus
M3M India Limited. – Respondent

Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Mr. Z. Rahman, Advocate
For the Opp. Parties:Mr. Yash Dewan and Ms. Avantika Thakur, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

Sangita Dhingra Sehgal (President)—The present complaint has been filed by the Complainant before this Commission alleging deficiency in service and unfair trade practices by the Opposite Parties and has prayed the following reliefs:

a) “Direct the OP-1 to OP-6 to pay Rs.1,00,38,780.00 (Rupees One Crore Thirty-Eight Thousand Seven Hundred and Eighty Only) along with simple interest of 24% p.a. to the Complainant from 19.01.2015 i.e., from the date of delivery of Apartment till the present day, or

b) Direct the OP-1 to OP-6 to execute the conveyance deed of the Apartment and handover the physical and vacant possession of the flat to the Complainant along with interest for delayed possession of Apartment,

c) Direct the OP to compensate an amount of Rs.10,00,000/- to the Complainant of the mental harassment she has suffered from pillar to part with her query to the Representatives of the OP.

d) Direct the OP to pay Cost of litigation of Rs.25,000/-.

e) Any other relief which this Hon’ble Commission deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be granted in favour of complainant in the interest of justice.”

2. Brief facts necessary for th